Google
 

Aardvark Daily

New Zealand's longest-running online daily news and commentary publication, now in its 19th year. The opinion pieces presented here are not purported to be fact but reasonable effort is made to ensure accuracy.

Content copyright © 1995 - 2015 to Bruce Simpson (aka Aardvark), the logo was kindly created for Aardvark Daily by the folks at aardvark.co.uk



Please visit the sponsor!
Please visit the sponsor!

Google listens (finally) but not to us

5 August 2015

Almost two years ago now, Google decided that it would force Google+ on its many millions of hapless users.

All around the world, previously happy YouTube users were outraged and many, including myself, posted videos expressing that outrage in a way that the company could hardly have missed (my vid)

Exercising a degree of arrogance and contempt that is rarely seen outside political circles, Google ignored this torrent of anger and ploughed on with its stated objective of forcing every Google service to be tied in some way to G+.

Until now.

Yes, after nearly two years, Google has finally conceded that their strategy of forcing G+ on users just isn't working.

Having come to this realisation, Google has announced that it will be disentangling most of its services (including YouTube) from a forced involvement with G+

I for one will be cheering loudly when this finally happens.

Even now, two years after its launch, G+ and its integration to many Google services is bug-ridden and confusing.

The integration with YouTube is still messy and continues to create confusion. Why is it, for example, that some comments people leave on videos have a "reply" link -- but others don't?

I often end up with multiple alerts with the same information being delivered to my YouTube, GMail and Google+ accounts and when you get hundreds of unique alerts per day, such duplication can dramatically increase the "noise" involved.

The big question of course is "why did it take Google so long to listen?"

Well the answer is probably that they never did listen. They've chosen to disentangle G+ from the rest of their offerings simply because it was hurting more than it was helping.

The beancounters will have told them that G+ was a bust and was never going to become a viable Facebook rival so best we don't tarnish our "good" products with this lowly also-ran. None of the clearly stated objections of actual users were considered to be worth listening to... the bottom-line is all that matters.

Having said that I don't like G+, I think Google missed a golden opportunity here.

I do know people who love G+ and I have to admit that there are aspects I think are also not too bad. The problem was that it became a use-only product. The "experts" at Google clearly had an idea in mind and there was no way they were going to let pesky users alter their vision.

If Google had rolled out G+ in a way that allowed people to opt-in (rather than be forced-in) then perhaps there would have been less resistance to it. If Google had been more active in soliciting and listening to user feedback then perhaps the product would have been a much better fit with people's wants and needs.

Sadly... that doesn't seem to be the Google way.

I can see why this might happen. It's not at all uncommon for someone to come up with a brilliant idea and then turn that idea into a commercial success. Boosted by the popularity and acceptance of that product, these people believe they have an unchallenged ability to "know what's best". What they fail to appreciate is that regardless of your prior success, the market always knows best what it wants.

Google has repeatedly shown contempt for the users of its services. They repeatedly tinker with products that are working very well -- breaking stuff and forcing unwanted changes on users. At the same time, they seem to have cloth-ears when it comes to the complaints or requests of those users.

It really does seem that Google has been reading too much of its own publicity these days.

I, and many millions of others, are waiting with great trepidation, for the next "improvement" to one or more of its services that Google decides to inflict upon us.

What do readers think? Is the de-integration of G+ a good idea?

Why did G+ fail to pose any real challenge to FaceBook?

Was the fact that they forced it upon users part of the problem?

Please visit the sponsor!
Please visit the sponsor!

Have your say in the Aardvark Forums.

PERMALINK to this column


Rank This Aardvark Page

 

Change Font

Sci-Tech headlines

 


Apart from the kind support of the sponsor, Aardvark Daily is largely a labour of love that involves many hours of hard work each month. If you appreciate the content you find here (or even if you don't) then please visit the sponsor and also feel free to gift me a donation using the button above.

Remember, this is purely a gift, you'll get nothing other than a warm fuzzy feeling in return.


Features:

Beware The Alternative Energy Scammers

The Great "Run Your Car On Water" Scam

 

The Missile Man The Missile Man book

Previous Columns

The folly of reducing the GST threshold
The government has indicated that it plans to drastically drop the threshold at which GST becomes payable on imported items...

China really is a superpower now
Long-time players in the tech industries will recall that from time to time the USA places export restrictions on technology it feels are of strategic value...

On the edge of excitement
Over the past week or so, I have been approached by a surprising number of companies and individuals who are seeking to create exciting new "solutions" to problems using drone technology...

Cool new space-travel tech
I love it when scientists discover some new phenomenon and find a way to harness it without actually understanding *why* it works...

Is that a hole in your pocket?
The latest bug in the Android mobile device OS is a shocker...

Triangles and the laws of physics
Every now and then, I have a rant about idiotic fuel-saver devices and you'd think by now people would have woken up to the fact that these things are just a scam...

Edging towards oblivion
The Trans Pacific Trade Agreement, or TPPA for short, is looking increasingly as if it is a fait accompli and regardless of what New Zealanders want...

New regs = lots of email
CAA launched their new "RPA" regs yesterday and I was simply not prepared for the level of work this would create for me...

What's in the news today?
There were several stories that caught my eye in on the newswires today so I thought I'd mention them...

Drones, ban the damned things!
If you were to believe everything you read you'd likely be all in favour of simply banning drones outright...

A deaf man listening for life
Mankind has had its ear to the wall of the ether for decades, waiting (so far without results) for the tell-tale murmurs of life on distant planets...