Note: This column represents the opinions
of the writer and as such, is not purported as fact
Sponsor's Message
|
I've got to admit that a news story
which has been running since yesterday has left me a little confused.
It seems that the Ministry of Transport want motorists to pay more tax towards
the building and maintenance of our roads.
Apparently, the already colossal amount of tax lumped onto petrol sales and
the road user charges (RUC) paid by diesel users simply isn't enough and they
want more.
Silly old I was under the obvious misapprehension that so much revenue was already
being collected from petrol taxes that most of it actually went into the
consolidated fund rather than being spent on roading. Is this really the case?
Now have your say
|
Got something to say about today's column, or want to see what
others think?
Visit The Forums
While you're here, why not visit the Aardvark
Hall of Shame
and perhaps make your own nomination. 7
|
|
New cars, we're told, are simply becoming too fuel-efficient, which means
that the tax-take from fuel-sales is likely to drop in coming years.
Sorry but I thought that a government so committed to reducing greenhouse
gas emissions and global warming would be pleased to hear such things. Indeed,
I would expect that paying less for fuel (and therefore less tax) would be
a great incentive for folks to upgrade to more fuel-efficient vehicles.
Instead however, it would appear that government may decide that the environmentally
aware amongst us will not be rewarded for their efforts as would be the case
under the current road-tax regime.
But let's get to technology... If government were to accept the recommendations
of this report, how would they go about ensuring that people paid their charges
on a per-Km basis rather than (or more likely "as well as") through a petrol tax?
Well it's more than possible now to equip every vehicle with a "black box" which
would automatically add up how many Kms were travelled and allow a charge to
be calculated accordingly.
As a diesel user, I know that it's a bit of a pain having to pay my RUC by
way of buying "Kms" at regular intervals. I also object to what amounts to
yet another "tax in advance" where I may be paying for something I'm not
going to use for as long as 6-12 months.
Surely a better way would be to have a smart system that could simply
download your "distance travelled since last billed" to the petrol pump you're
using at the local service station so that the RUC could just be added to
your bill each time you fill up?
Yes, there'd be a set-up cost -- but have you seen how much money we're already
handing over by way of vehicle-related taxes??? I'm sure that if the gas-stations
were given a small commission on collecting this money they'd be more than happy
to invest in the necessary equipment.
But no, my bet is that we'll be stuck with a paper-based system whereby you
have to buy several months worth of RUC in advance and risk paying a *massive*
penalty if you're caught driving without having paid for this in advance (as
is currently the case with diesel).
I really wonder whether the bureaucratic and administrative overheads associated
with a move to Km-based RUC for petrol-powered vehicles would be worth it.
What's your take on this issue?
Would a move to Kms-based RUC for petrol-powered vehicles be a good one, or
would it unfairly penalise those who have a long-commute in an area where there's
no public transport? Would it also become a disincentive to drive more
environmentally friendly vehicles and thus reduce green-house gas emissions?
Or maybe government will opt for two bites of the apple: hitting you per Km
for your RUC and per litre for the carbon-tax.
Things are perhaps starting to look a bit grim for NZers over the next five years
aren't they? How will you afford to fill your car's tank with rapidly rising
mortgage rates, RUC and carbon taxes all sucking away at your paypacket?
Tell us all and see what others have to say in
The Aardvark Forums
Yes, You Can Gift Money
I've published this website for the past nine years as a service to the
local internet and IT industry and during all that time it has been 100%
free to access. It is my intention to ensure that it remains completely
free and free of charge and contains only the most sparse levels of advertising.
Aardvark is not a business, it is a free resource.
If you feel that this is a good thing and/or you hold a "geniune affection"
for yours truly -- then you are welcome to gift me some
money using the buttons provided. In gifting this money you accept that no goods,
service or other consideration is offered, provided, accepted or anticipated in return.
Just click on the button to gift whatever you can afford.
NOTE: PayPal bills in US dollars so don't accidentally gift more than
what you were intending :-)
Contacting Aardvark
I'm always happy to hear from readers, whether they're delivering brickbats,
bouquets or news tip-offs.
If you'd like to contact me directly, please
this form. If you're happy for me to republish
your comments then please be sure and select For Publication.
Other media organisations seeking more information or republication rights
are also invited to contact me.
Add Aardvark To Your Own Website!
Got a moment? Want a little extra fresh content for your own website or
page?
Just add a
couple of lines of JavaScript
to your pages and you can get
a free summary of Aardvark's daily commentary -- automatically updated
each and every week-day.
Aardvark also makes a summary of this daily column available via XML using
the RSS format. More details can be found
here.
Contact me if you decide to use either of these feeds and
have any problems.
Linking Policy
Want to link to this site? Check out Aardvark's
Linking Policy.
|
Did you tell someone else about Aardvark today? If not then do it
now!
|
|