Google
 

Aardvark Daily

The world's longest-running online daily news and commentary publication, now in its 30th year. The opinion pieces presented here are not purported to be fact but reasonable effort is made to ensure accuracy.

Content copyright © 1995 - 2025 to Bruce Simpson (aka Aardvark), the logo was kindly created for Aardvark Daily by the folks at aardvark.co.uk



Please visit the sponsor!
Please visit the sponsor!

Breaking news: but we can't tell you what it is

28 July 2011

As regular readers know, I quickly race around the interweb every morning and aggregate a set of headlines and short extracts from the sci-tech stories which I think are most important or interesting.

These headlines, excerpts and links are then published on the Aardvark News Links page so that readers can save themselves the hassles of having to browse a dozen or more key sites to see what's happening in the hi-tech world.

Readers will also recall that my 7am News organisation was built on the concept of news headline/link aggregation and that it's a model which Google now uses extensively for its Google News site.

Well bad news was on the wires this morning...

It seems that, according to the UK Court of Appeal, headlines are now protected by copyright and may be considered separate literary works.

Having been effectively granted this status by the UK courts, news publishers are now entitled to either forbid the use of those headlines by aggregators (like myself) or to charge a fee for their use.

An overview of the case which resulted in the ruling and the subsequent appeal can be found in these two stories from The Telegraph:

Does this mean that, in quoting those headlines, I've committed an offense under copyright law?

Well if I was in the UK, I probably did.

However, it should be remembered that copyright is a "right" which is bestowed upon the copyright owner. If they choose not to exercise that right then no prosecutions for infringement will be forthcoming.

I strongly doubt that most newspapers will exercise their right to demand fees from bloggers or aggregators who quote their headlines and provide links to their stories, since they see the value in such "traffic direction" to be worth far more than the paltry sums anyone might be prepared to pay.

However, this court ruling must call into question the concept of "fair use".

In most countries, copyright law provides exemptions where copyrighted material is reproduced in part for the purposes of review, criticism, parody or news reporting. That doesn't mean a work can be quoted entirely -- it simply means that in some circumstances, others are entitled to reproduce a snippet of someone else's work so as to provide context for their own work.

By classifying a news headline as a separate literary work, the concept of fair use is sorely challenged.

I would also challenge the court's assertion that *all* headlines represent a literary work.

For example, here are a few headlines from today's stuff website:

  • Kiwi confirmed dead
  • Dollar slips from high
  • Privacy concern addressed
  • Breivik explosives detonated

Come on... can a three word phrase really be considered a literary work worthy of copyright protection?

I would argue that it can't -- after all, the very raison d'etre for trademark legislation is because short phrases are usually considered not eligible for copyright protection. If you want to "own" a phrase, you generally have to apply for trademark protection -- so why should newspapers be granted copyright protection for the same?

So fear not -- I shan't be paying any huge stipend to the news organisations for the use of their headlines and, if they come knocking on my door demanding their dues, I shall send them away with a flea in their ear. I'll ether not bother to carry their stories or I shall simply rewrite their headlines (it really doesn't take long to come up with new literary work of this scale you know).

What do you think?

Has the UK court's granting copyright protection for headlines effectively undermined the need for trademark legislation in that country?

Is the UK court system out of touch with reality and the cyberworld?

Remember the word "aardvarkrox" when you go to sign up for the new forums (yeah, I know I haven't customised it yet but bear with me ;-)

Please visit the sponsor!
Please visit the sponsor!

Have your say on this...

PERMALINK to this column

Oh, and don't forget today's sci/tech news headlines


Rank This Aardvark Page

 

Change Font

Sci-Tech headlines

 


Features:

The EZ Battery Reconditioning scam

Beware The Alternative Energy Scammers

The Great "Run Your Car On Water" Scam

 

Recent Columns

What is happening to Bitcoin?
Something interesting is happening to the crypto-currency Bitcoin...

Smoke, mirrors and a leather jacket
Earlier this week I reported on NVIDIA's big announcement at Computex...

I have my own AI LLM now
There was a story on the newswires earlier this week which claimed that a US company had ended up with a half-billion dollar bill as the result of "enthusiastic" IA usage...

AI, the new attack vector
We are all told that AI is going to change the world and I don't doubt that for one minute...

Has NVIDIA just killed AMD and Intel?
Computex is underway in Taipei and although the rise of AI has meant that there have been very few "exciting" announcements...

The age of big iron
Modern computers are small, fast, cost-effective and energy efficient...

Space and bureaucrats
First-up today, another potential risk for SpaceX's Starlink service -- the only profitable part of the SpaceX empire right now...

The end of drones and desktop computing
What is going on in the world today? ...

After the boom
There are growing signs that the AI bubble is near to bursting...

SpaceX IPO, what could possibly go wrong?
SpaceX is getting ready to go public with an earth-shattering IPO...