Google
 

Aardvark Daily

New Zealand's longest-running online daily news and commentary publication, now in its 24th year. The opinion pieces presented here are not purported to be fact but reasonable effort is made to ensure accuracy.

Content copyright © 1995 - 2018 to Bruce Simpson (aka Aardvark), the logo was kindly created for Aardvark Daily by the folks at aardvark.co.uk



Please visit the sponsor!
Please visit the sponsor!

More on the new TPPA

30 January 2018

The previous government was hell-bent on pushing through the TPPA, seemingly without regard for the overall effect on New Zealand's economy or sovereignty.

One of the strongest opponents of the TPPA was the Labour party yet, strangely enough, now that they are in power, they are also championing this trade agreement as a positive thing.

Hypocrisy? Or have there been some fundamental changes to the TPPA that have turned it from evil to good?

Well from where I stand, there's a little bit of both but I am certainly not happy at the about-face that Labour has engaged in and I do not think we should be signing up to the current offering.

Here's why.

The most negative aspects of the original TPPA were the draconian changes to copyright law that would have been forced upon us.

Driven mainly by powerful US corporate interests, the old TPPA would have required New Zealand to extend the term of copyright protection so as to fall into line with the USA's own domestic laws and it would also have prevented some things which are quite legal (and reasonable) under our existing framework.

Other IP provisions might have seen Pharmac's right to bulk-buy and opt for generic drugs in order to reduce the nation's health bill canceled or at least significantly eroded.

Our government would also have been liable to prosecution if it decided to exercise its sovereign right to pass new laws -- should those laws have adversely affected any foreign company. Under the original TPPA, companies so affected would have had a right to sue to recover losses.

In short... the government's right to pass laws that best-benefit the nation was being sold for a few beads and blankets by way of (sometimes only slightly) reduced tariffs with overseas markets.

When the USA pulled out of the TPPA, the remaining parties did a quick re-think and came up with a new variant they called the CPTPP. Whilst this version is slightly better than the original, there is a very worrying word used far too often: "suspended".

Now the Labour government is telling everyone that we don't have to worry about the more draconian elements of the old TPPA (such as the copyright changes) because they won't apply in the new agreement.

I'm sorry but that's more than a little disingenuous.

The most contentious elements of the original TPPA have not been removed from the new document, merely "suspended". They're still there, able to be activated at a later date -- should the USA decide to knock on the door.

I'm sorry... that's just not good enough.

Imagine if we sign up to the CPTPP in March and everything goes along just fine for a year or so... then the USA (as Trump has clearly indicated he may do) then decides that the USA will join.

If/when that happens, there's a very real possibility that all the things we hated most about the TPPA will become un-suspended and have effect.

I'm not having that!

If Labour really wants us to sign up to this deal then the word "suspended" should be replaced by the phrase "struck out".

Let's face it, politicians are devious sods at the best of times so why would they merely suspend something if they had no intention of reactivating it at a later date?

Not good enough Labour... your hypocrisy is showing!

And, in case you're interested, here is a list of those "suspensions".

What do readers think? Is this good enough or is it just another cunning ploy to slip this crap past while they think we are asleep?

Please visit the sponsor!
Please visit the sponsor!

Have your say in the Aardvark Forums.

PERMALINK to this column


Rank This Aardvark Page

 

Change Font

Sci-Tech headlines

 


Features:

Beware The Alternative Energy Scammers

The Great "Run Your Car On Water" Scam

 

Recent Columns

Time, the ultimate creator
No, I haven't been smoking the wacky-baccy or indulging in mind-altering substances (beyond a glass of wine with my dinner) but you might think so after reading today's column...

Peak smartphone?
There was a time when many of us upgraded our PCs every couple of years because the technology was moving at such a fast pace that you'd see a significant improvement in power and performance with each new machine...

BBC resorts to clickbait
Sigh... clickbait and fake news are the stock and trade of the mainstream media these days and it appears that even the (once) almighty BBC are engaged...

A *billion* dollar idea
As I mentioned in my last column, Google has now equipped its Chrome browser with the ability to defeat the worst in aggressive advertising formats on the Web...

Chrome anti-competitive?
Google's Chrome browser now has a feature that will reportedly stop 97 percent of all those really annoying ads from interrupting your browsing experience...

What ever happened to fuel cells?
Electric vehicles are set to become the next big thing...

Can you sense the frustration?
When the current CEO of the South Waikato District Council took up his position several years ago, I invited him to my studio-workshop to discuss how I could help promote the district he now managed...

Is now a good time to wait?
I ran a CPU benchmark on my video rendering machine last night and was gobsmacked at how much slower it is than "state of the art" silicon...

Beyond a joke
Yes, today's column is another of those boring gripes about CAA and drones...

Plastic, a bigger threat than climate change?
A regular reader sent me an email the other day containing a link to a worrying report that everyone should read...

Babies versus boosters, no contest
Yesterday was a fantastic day for any geek, space enthusiast or anyone who has the heart and imagination of a little boy...