Google
 

Aardvark Daily

The world's longest-running online daily news and commentary publication, now in its 30th year. The opinion pieces presented here are not purported to be fact but reasonable effort is made to ensure accuracy.

Content copyright © 1995 - 2025 to Bruce Simpson (aka Aardvark), the logo was kindly created for Aardvark Daily by the folks at aardvark.co.uk



Please visit the sponsor!
Please visit the sponsor!

Die by wire?

1 December 2025

A very interesting event occurred over the weekend.

The world's fleet of A320 airliners was temporarily grounded for safety reasons.

Airbus was the first commercial airliner manufacturer to switch to "fly by wire" (FBW) control systems, quite a few years ago.

The rationale for this change was that by placing computers between the pilot and the aircraft's control surfaces, pilot error could be reduced and lives saved.

For example, one of the most dangerous situations for an aircraft is the stall. This occurs when the wing passes a critical angle of attack and a sudden loss of lift occurs. There have been many instances where this has happened as the result incorrect control inputs by pilots and despite warning strategies such as "stick shakers", stalls are still an ever-present danger.

A FBW system with computers monitoring every input can eliminate the chances of a stall by filtering the pilot's control inputs and ensuring that the wing never reaches the critical angle that induces such a stall.

Of course there is another school of thought when it comes to adding mountains of safety technology to an aircraft and that is "the more there is, the more there is to go wrong".

There have been instances where allowing a computer to over-ride the control inputs of a pilot has resulted in disaster. However, such cases are far fewer than the number of times a FBW system has intervened to save the day.

One of the problems of FBW is that it relies on software, often lots of software.

As anyone who's ever used a computer knows (yes, that's you), software can have bugs and complex software can have very subtle bugs that are only triggered once in a lifetime. In the case of FBW software, that may be the the end of that lifetime.

Airbus took the rare but essential step of grounding its fleet of A320 airliners over the weekend because of a bug in its FBW software. In particular, the software that creates a system called the ELAC. This code controls the elevators and ailerons of the aircraft and runs on two separate computers, for redundancy purposes.

In October, Airbus had rolled out an update to the ELAC software which seemed fine -- until one aircraft encountered an uncommanded elevator input that saw it dive steeply for around five seconds.

Not only did this darken the underwear of the pilots but it also caused several injuries, something that is simply not acceptable in the risk-averse world of commercial aviation.

Subsiquent investigations pointed to the second ELAC computer having perhaps suffered bit-flip as the result of the ionizing radiation often encountered at high altitudes where there's far less of the earth's atmosphere to protect from such things. Under normal circumstances the ELAC-1 system should have immediately taken over and maintained the aircraft's course and attitude but as a result of the recent update, this handover was way too slow.

The solution?

Well just as when Microsoft stuff up a Windows update, Airbus has rolled back the latest update and are now operating on the previous software version for these systems.

Apparently this will solve the problem.

However, you have to wonder, especially given the high levels of solar activity (flares, CMEs etc) that are going on right now, just what are the risks of FBW systems at very high altitudes?

Imagine of ELAC 1 and ELAC 2 both got hit by some kind of burst of radiation and both failed at the same time. Remember that *all* the pilot's control inputs are moderated by these computers and if they both fail I suspect very bad things would happen.

Maybe if they could be rebooted and the affected memory re-initialised then control could be regained but would that happen before the aircraft hit the ground or perhaps broke up due to overspeed in a steep dive?

To be honest, I would have expected that these computer systems would have been heavily screened against such radiation but Google's Gemini says:

"while aircraft computers are not physically shielded from radiation, they are designed with multiple layers of redundancy and safety features to handle it, but these can be overcome by extreme events"

Ah well, nothing is guaranteed in life... except death.

Carpe Diem folks!

Please visit the sponsor!
Please visit the sponsor!

Here is a PERMANENT link to this column


Rank This Aardvark Page

 

Change Font

Sci-Tech headlines

 


Features:

The EZ Battery Reconditioning scam

Beware The Alternative Energy Scammers

The Great "Run Your Car On Water" Scam

 

Recent Columns

This is not good: WEF
The 2026 meeting of the World Economic Forum (WEF) is about to take place in Davos, Switzerland...

AI costs us a lot
Artificial Intelligence (AI) will affect the future of everyone on the planet, or so we're promised...

The kill-switch weakness
The USA is heading for a conflict with European nations...

Governments go anti-tech
Technology is great. It makes our lives easier, more productive and often a lot more fun...

The ravages of old age kicking in
I'm getting on... 73 next month! ...

I'm having so much fun
While the rest of the world gripes and moans about the rapidly rising cost of DRAM and GPUs, I've been...

Solid state battery a scam?
Imagine a battery that stores 400 watt-hours per Kg, can be fully recharged in just five minutes and...

Time to dismantle representative democracy?
No, don't worry, I haven't gone wildly left-wing or embraced the charms of dictatorial communism...

Reviving old skills
There is no doubt about it, computer prices are about to go through the roof...

More on the ManageMyHealth hack
Earlier this week I wrote about a couple of hacking incidents here in New Zealand which seem to have exposed the personal information of hundreds of thousands of Kiwis...