Google
 

Aardvark Daily

New Zealand's longest-running online daily news and commentary publication, now in its 25th year. The opinion pieces presented here are not purported to be fact but reasonable effort is made to ensure accuracy.

Content copyright © 1995 - 2019 to Bruce Simpson (aka Aardvark), the logo was kindly created for Aardvark Daily by the folks at aardvark.co.uk



Please visit the sponsor!
Please visit the sponsor!

Court: Kodi streams OK, caching not

13 July 2018

Some time ago, SkyTV took a case to court claiming that preloaded Kodi boxes were illegal and breached copyright.

Well yesterday a district court ruled on that case and although you probably won't be surprised that the court sided with SkyTV, you may be surprised to find out exactly how this decision was arrived at.

The judge in this case ruled "that people who had bought Kodi boxes from Fibre TV were breaking the Copyright Act because copyright-infringing content would be cached on the devices before it was watched".

That's right... the "gotcha" is not that the streaming itself is illegal but that the material is cached before it's passed on to the TV set.

How does that work?

Doesn't our copyright Act allow immunity for cached copies of protected works?

Well it does, and it doesn't.

I have to take my hat off to our law-makers in this case. They were clearly thinking ahead when they devised section 43A of The Copyright Act 1994.

This piece of the act very clearly states:

A reproduction of a work does not infringe copyright in the work if the reproduction

  • (a) is transient or incidental; and
  • (b) is an integral and essential part of a technological process for --
    • (i) making or receiving communication that does not infringe copyright; or
    • (ii) enabling the lawful use of, or lawful dealing in, the work

So you see... if you're legitimately watching a YouTube, Netflix or other stream which contains protected material you have a right to view then the cache on your computer, smartphone, Kodi box or whatever is non-infringing.

However, the moment you start watching a pirated stream or stream a movie without license from the copyright holder, your cache becomes an unlawful and infringing copy.

Cunning eh?

But in that case, isn't your ISP and all the others in the long chain from the source of the stream and your own player also infringing?

Maybe, maybe not.

Section 92E of the Copyright Act 1994 provides a degree of exemption for ISPs (who can't be expected to know if the stuff they're carrying and potentially caching is actually legal or not) but it does include a clause 92.1.b which states:

An Internet service provider does not infringe copyright in a work by caching material if the internet service provider -- complies with any conditions imposed by the copyright owner of the material for access to that material

This is perhaps one area where the Act might need a bit of of a tidy-up. An ISP can not know if a packet of data is protected by copyright and therefore they can't know the terms of that copyright so as to ensure they are compliant.

Naturally, we'd expect the courts to take this into account when examining any prosecution alleging that, by caching illegal material, an ISP was guilty of a breach of the Act. However, as we all know, justice increasingly goes to the party with the biggest wallet so if one of the rich movie studios or music publishers decided to accuse an ISP of violating copyright even though they were packet-agnostic, the Act would seemingly provide no protection for the ISP in such cases.

So am I going to stop using my Kodi box?

Hell no because, as we all know, I only use it to watch YouTube videos anyway.

Please visit the sponsor!
Please visit the sponsor!

Have your say in the Aardvark Forums.

PERMALINK to this column


Rank This Aardvark Page

 

Change Font

Sci-Tech headlines

 


Features:

Beware The Alternative Energy Scammers

The Great "Run Your Car On Water" Scam

 

Recent Columns

Oh the irony
YouTube has made a lot of noise about enforcing its community standards of late...

The end of live streaming?
The events of last Friday continue to have deep repercussions on the shape and form that the internet may take from this point forwards...

More internet restrictions
It really does look as if the internet is dying -- from the perspective of being an open, free and somewhat anonymous method of accessing and disseminating information...

The future looks bleak
Today's column was going to be about the tragedy of the Christchurch mosque attacks which happened on Friday of last week...

No longer plane simple
Just about every country in the developed world has now grounded the Boeing 737 Max 8 aircraft, after two crashes that have resulted in the deaths of hundreds of people...

When the sun shines
We all know where clouds live... in the sky...

Actions speak louder than words
I've written a few columns about the (apparent) decline in geekiness and the sad way people seem to be uninterested in the technology that powers the world around us...

A black-box society?
A few days ago I made a video (as you do) about how there seems to be a lack of interest in "making stuff" these days...

Tightening the screws?
The UK is pulling out of the EU in a move that has been called "Brexit"...

Treating symptoms not causes
Governments like to treat symptoms rather than causes...

Money-grab delayed
If you read yesterday's column, you may be interested in what has happened subsequently...