Google
 

Aardvark Daily

New Zealand's longest-running online daily news and commentary publication, now in its 25th year. The opinion pieces presented here are not purported to be fact but reasonable effort is made to ensure accuracy.

Content copyright © 1995 - 2019 to Bruce Simpson (aka Aardvark), the logo was kindly created for Aardvark Daily by the folks at aardvark.co.uk



Please visit the sponsor!
Please visit the sponsor!

I'm on a government list

20 August 2019

Regular readers will well be aware of the fact that I've been on the government's radar for quite some time.

Back at the start of the century, I rattled the cages of power and authority around the world by daring to build my own cruise missile out of parts sourced from eBay and down at the local hardware store. This was long before the era of drones and caught "the powers that be" well off-guard.

Of course a lot of water has flowed under the bridge since then and despite my warnings, it's only now that governments are acknowledging the threat from privately owned unmanned aerial craft (ie: drones, cruise-missiles, etc). Of course, as is so often the case, I was roundly thrashed for daring to provide an advanced warning of the threat -- but then again... nobody likes a smart alec eh?

These days of course, it's the governments of the world crying about the risk of drones and other unmanned aircraft -- whilst I'm saying "the risk has existed for more than a decade and a half and you didn't care so why care now?"

So I wrote to the Minister of Transport about the matter.

He replied "your name is on a list".

Should I be worried?

Okay, this isn't as sinister as it might appear.

Although I might still be on other lists of "people to keep an eye on", the list Mr Twyford is refering to is a list of people that the CAA and Ministry of Transport are intending to contact directly over the issue of new drone regulations for New Zealand.

So yesterday I posted a video sharing this letter from the minister and giving my thoughts on what it really means.

A piece of material I used in that video is the advertisement that Airshare has been running on many drone-related videos when viewed in New Zealand.

This ad proudly claims that there are almost 300,000 people who own or fly drones in New Zealand (even though the government's own figures suggest closer to 77,000).

The ad also goes on to say that there are 5,000 manned aircraft in New Zealand.

Woah... hold up a minute Maureen!

Even if we take the government's estimate of around 77,000 drones in New Zealand, that means there are around fifteen times as many drones as manned aircraft here in NZ.

So why is it that drone users (numbering as many as 300,000) are being marginalised in favour of manned aviators whose numbers are more than an order of magnitude less in number?

Why is it that in the upcoming discussions aimed at changing NZ's drone regulations, the community of 300,000 gets but one seat at the table, whilst the community barely 1/10th the size gets multiple seats?

Why are so many of those involved in making the rules, people who have no first-hand experience with drones, many instead coming from the manned-aviation community which is (as we've seen) in the minority?

Would we take the advice of the hospital receptionist over experienced and qualified surgeons when deciding how to safely perform open-heart surgery I wonder?

I expect that my name may be on a few more "government lists" before this entire process is complete, as I will not be sitting idly by and allowing bureaucrats and those with little experience, understanding or knowledge of that which they're attempting to control, roll out a raft of ridculously restrictive and onerous regulations to burden such a large community of people as the recreational drone flying community.

If you think the protests in Hong Kong are pretty radical... stay tuned! :-)

However, unlike the idiots who have made it their stated intention to fly drones near Heathrow airport in the UK, I won't be advocating for any actions that would put person, pets or property in jeopardy. And of course, if the politicians and bureaucrats are really focused on safety (rather than arse-covering, commercial agendas or self-interest) then all will go very smoothly anway, with concepts such as registering children's toys being kicked firmly to the kerb without dissent.

I'd love to hear the predictions of readers as to how this will go :-)

Please visit the sponsor!
Please visit the sponsor!

Have your say in the Aardvark Forums.

PERMALINK to this column


Rank This Aardvark Page

 

Change Font

Sci-Tech headlines

 


Features:

The EZ Battery Reconditioning scam

Beware The Alternative Energy Scammers

The Great "Run Your Car On Water" Scam

 

Recent Columns

The formula for stupid is...
I think someone has discovered the formula for stupid...

Is LED poisoning now a thing?
We all know about the dangers of lead poisoning...

Clowns making laws
Yesterday's column didn't produce much activity in the forums, the ones about drones seldom do...

Proof: Bad laws mean low compliance
Governments have a difficult task: coming up with rules that adequately balance the rights of the individual with the need for public safety...

It makes my blood boil
History is an interesting, if not wholely accurate subject...

A year, with Parkinson's
I can't remember how long ago it was that I was diagnosed with Parkinson's but it must be around a year or so...

Logic versus hope
I see that the Lotto jackpot has reached $32 million this Saturday...

5G, what will it do for us?
There has been much fearmongering over the possible health effects of a 5G rollout...

An unforseen problem with subscription software
Software as a service has become a big thing...

Grandstanding versus real action
Extinction Revolution. Ugh!...

When EVs go wrong
Electric vehicles are the future. No, they're actually the present -- right here, right now....