Google
 

Aardvark Daily

New Zealand's longest-running online daily news and commentary publication, now in its 25th year. The opinion pieces presented here are not purported to be fact but reasonable effort is made to ensure accuracy.

Content copyright © 1995 - 2019 to Bruce Simpson (aka Aardvark), the logo was kindly created for Aardvark Daily by the folks at aardvark.co.uk



Please visit the sponsor!
Please visit the sponsor!

Online influencers to be taxed more

3 May 2021

I was audited by the tax man quite a few years ago now.

Learning that I earned most of my revenues from my online presence on YouTube, the taxman wanted to know if I ever received freebies and I admitted that yes, this was the case.

I was told that that free stuff would be considered "income" and I would be required to pay tax on the basis of its value. If a company sent me a $100 product to review then that would be considered an additional $100 of income and taxed accordingly.

Naturally I objected to this assertion and I think my comment was something along the lines of "How can it be income? I can't go down to the local dairy and buy milk or eggs using a toy foam plane as payment".

"Ah, but you could sell it and then that money could be used to buy stuff, hence it is income" was pretty much the reply.

"Who wants to buy a second-hand, battered, broken toy plane?" I queried.

The discussion went back and forth for a while, until what I felt was a reasonable agreement was reached.

If I don't sell any of this stuff then it can hardly be considered income can it?

This is why I never sell anything that has been provided to me free of charge for review purposes by a company or individual. In fact, I have mountains of stuff that has been reviewed and then simply packed away. Most of that stuff is now worthless, simply because the technology involved ages so very quickly.

Well it seems that the IRD is now targeting other "social media influencers" and it wants to make sure they're paying their fair share of tax on any "benefits" and non-cash incomes they're scoring as a result of "free stuff" they might receive.

This Stuff story explains the situation.

It seems that they've woken up to the fact that some folk are scoring quite a lot of gear for free and I guess many of those folk are flogging that stuff off for some coin. The IRD's perspective seems to have changed a little since my discussions with them and now, according to the Stuff item:

"You’re responsible for assessing the likely re-sale value of the items you receive and paying tax on that amount – and that’s even though you haven’t actually sold the items and received that amount in cash"

Well here's my deal for the IRD. You're welcome to come around to my workshop and take your pick of the free stuff that's all boxed up here. Yes, I'm more than happy to pay my fair share of tax on income but it will be paid in kind. If you say this stuff is the equivalent of cash then just come and take your cut, I'm sure you'll find something to delight you within the boxes of wires, components, broken toy planes and other stuff that has accumulated here over the years.

If those items are *not* considered a suitable form of payment for what might be owed to the IRD then why are you suggesting that *I* consider them a form of payment?

Also, I do not accept freebies for promoting someone's products. Just check out my review channel and you will see that indeed, a fairly high percentage of the products I review get a thumbs-down review so there is a negative promotional value to these items.

Of course my social media activities are somewhat different to those of your average "influencer". Most people making a living out of their online "influencer" activities tend to be little more than shills. They'll gladly accept whatever "free stuff" is offered to them and frequently they'll also accept payment for "positive" reviews. They are indeed acting as sales agents for the products and are compensated accordingly.

That's not how I work.

I do not use affiliate links or accept commissions. I do not accept payment for reviews, nor do I accept any kind of editorial direction or input. My reviews are 100 percent objective, unswayed by commercial imperatives.

For that reason, any "freebies" I get are solely for the purpose of evaluation and performing the review, there is no financial benefit to me arising from the sale of those items and I do not sell them on to realise any potential additional value they may represent.

Indeed, if I had to consider the review samples I receive as income, I would simply stop doing what I'm doing because I could not afford to buy *everything* I review. As a result, I would start drawing my taxpayer-funded supperannuation, the country would lose the export dollars I earn every year and I would no longer be paying the $12K or so of income tax that I currently contribute to the nation's coffers every year.

Sadly, bureaucrats don't always take a hollistic view of things so they may decide to change their mind on what I'm doing -- only time will tell I guess.

Please visit the sponsor!
Please visit the sponsor!

Have your say in the Aardvark Forums.

PERMALINK to this column


Rank This Aardvark Page

 

Change Font

Sci-Tech headlines

 


Features:

The EZ Battery Reconditioning scam

Beware The Alternative Energy Scammers

The Great "Run Your Car On Water" Scam

 

Recent Columns

The tech cold-war gets real
In the past I have written a few columns about the way that China is gaining rapidly on the US in terms of technological and military capabilities...

Criminal masterminds?
This is the sort of thing you wouldn't believe if it was in a book or a movie...

If I could, I would
One of my fantasies is to buy a big block of land, erect a wall around its perimeter, go off-grid and simply set up my own principality...

Mine crypto, get a free lunch?
Norton Antivirus has come up with a new business model that could set a trend...

Could higher taxes boost crypto?
Crypto-currency seems to be very popular with those who consider the laws to be advisory rather than compulsory...

Doing more with less?
It is looking as if the current chip shortage may last longer than originally thought...

Should free shipping be illegal?
One of the biggest drawcards for online shopping is the promise by some vendors that you'll get free shipping...

Publisher or platform?
Dealing with user-generated content online is a tricky problem...

Something to watch this weekend
This weekend is going to be cold and wet in most places around the country -- perfect weather to read a book or watch a movie...

Google has no ethics
I was searching online for inspiration this morning and I spotted a small banner ad served up by Google's ad network...

Lunar eclipse, for the last time?
Apparently there is a full lunar eclipse taking place tonight...