Google
 

Aardvark Daily

The world's longest-running online daily news and commentary publication, now in its 30th year. The opinion pieces presented here are not purported to be fact but reasonable effort is made to ensure accuracy.

Content copyright © 1995 - 2025 to Bruce Simpson (aka Aardvark), the logo was kindly created for Aardvark Daily by the folks at aardvark.co.uk



Please visit the sponsor!
Please visit the sponsor!

Don't trust YouTube reviews

2 February 2022

I create reviews of products and publish them on YouTube.

I'm pretty good at what I do so my review channel has over a quarter of a million subscribers.

Almost every day I get emails from companies eager to have me review their products.

Increasingly I have to say no to these solicitations.

Why?

Well it's because these companies don't actually want you to review the product, they want you to sell it.

I won't name names (yet) but a typical example was a relatively well-known (within the RC flying model and drone sector) Chinese company that approached me to "review" some of their new offerings.

Initially they simply asked "would you like to review these products?"

I responded that "yes, I would be happy to review those products" and I included my delivery address by return email.

A few days passed and I received a follow-up email from them asking me to confirm that I would comply with their "conditions" before review samples were sent.

I reviewed their "conditions" and replied "sorry, I will be unable to review your products because..."

What was it that changed my mind?

Well the companies "conditions" involved so many restrictions and directions that there is no way I could have created an honest, objective review of the products involved.

They effectively wanted full editorial control over the content, the tone and the outcome of the review. They wanted the right to review it prior to publication and submit changes that would have to be done before it was accepted by them.

They also demanded that I sign up to their affiliate program and include an affilate link to the products with the review.

In short, this company didn't want a review, they wanted me to make an advertisement for them which would be paid for by getting free product and earning a commission on subsiquent sales.

I'm sorry, that's not how *THIS* reviewer operates. A paid review which cedes all editorial control to the supplier is not a review at all and becomes a fraud on anyone who watches such a video in the expectation that it's going to be honest and unbiased.

This is the very reason that I made a commitment never to post affiliate links on my reviews. The moment you introduce a commercial imperative to a review it can no longer be trusted as a reliable source of information.

Sadly, due to massively declining ad revenues and other factors, almost all those who review products on YouTube do have affiliate links associated with the products they're reviewing. To be fair, there are still a few who can be trusted to call a spade a spade but there are also plenty who simply sell their soul to the devil and sit back to reap the financial rewards associated with doing so.

What's worrying to me, as an *honest* reviewer, is that I see quite a few other reviewers who have obviously agreed to the "conditions" this manufacturer has demanded -- but those reviewers are not being up-front and disclosing this to their audience. This is a sad fraud on the public and means that I don't take any heed of reviews published by channels that have done this.

As a member of the public however, you'll never know which is which.

This is a tragedy because online reviews used to be one of the best ways to find out whether it was worth spending your money on something. Now, unless you are 100 percent sure you can trust the reviewer, they might just be selling you a turd in order to feather their own nest.

Of course I've been talking only about the RC hobby market but you can be absolutely sure that the same tactics are being used by the manufacturers and retailers of other products across the board.

Think twice before you take a reviewer's word on something and if in doubt... just check the video description for obvious signs of an affiliate link. This doesn't necessarily mean the review is invalid but it does raise the chances significantly.

Please visit the sponsor!
Please visit the sponsor!

Have your say in the Aardvark Forums.

PERMALINK to this column


Rank This Aardvark Page

 

Change Font

Sci-Tech headlines

 


Features:

The EZ Battery Reconditioning scam

Beware The Alternative Energy Scammers

The Great "Run Your Car On Water" Scam

 

Recent Columns

Space is still hard
The folks at NASA had hoped to send astronauts into space...

Time
If you are anything like me you remember the impact that the Christmas holidays had on your life as a child...

Hardware, not software
There was a time when computer hardware was just a commodity...

It was shocking
Yesterday our local council, the South Waikato District Council, had a meeting...

I forgot how bad things were
Modern computer games are incredible...

All the signs point to disaster
Many seasoned financial analysts and commentators are starting to issue warnings about the state of the global economy...

The ultimate retro computer tech
The older I get, the more I appreciate the fun we had with older computer systems...

Tech versus politics
Technology is a powerful tool that can be used to either reveal the truth or supress it...

Weather or climate? (again)
As someone whose mood is quite significantly affected by the weather, I have to say that I'm feeling rather grumpy and irritable right now...

BBC grasps at straws
Who remembers the TV license?...