Google
 

Aardvark Daily

The world's longest-running online daily news and commentary publication, now in its 30th year. The opinion pieces presented here are not purported to be fact but reasonable effort is made to ensure accuracy.

Content copyright © 1995 - 2025 to Bruce Simpson (aka Aardvark), the logo was kindly created for Aardvark Daily by the folks at aardvark.co.uk



Please visit the sponsor!
Please visit the sponsor!

Welcome, generation snowflake

02 Dec 2024

I read a story on the tabloid site Stuff.co.nz this morning that made me feel more than a little cross.

Carrying the headline Internal police emails reveal alarm over bill that reduces oversight of clubs and ranges, the story seems to be yet another example of how we are considered by some to all be irresponsible idiots who ought not be trusted by "the state" or the police.

In essence, it paints a picture that gun clubs and sports shooters can't be trusted to act responsibly and safely therefore, they must be closely monitored and scrutinised by police -- for the public's safety.

Now I agree that firearms have the potential to represent an extreme danger to the public and there are plenty of incidents to prove this. However, almost without exception, those incidents do not involve people who are deeply vested in sports shooting.

The allegations in this story are deeply insulting to those who, more than almost anyone else, appreciate the risks and responsibilities associated with firearm use.

I used to be a licensed firearms owner and I had a nice little collection of guns.

I had everything from air-rifles through regular .22LR bolt-action, .22 magnum and 30-calibre hunting rifle to a classic SKS military-styled semi-automatic.

These guns were used regularly because I lived in a rural area and they served as useful tools for pest (rabbits and possums) control as well as providing food for the table, in the form of deer, turkey and other tasty creatures.

Of course I also had a lot of fun just "plinking" down in the gulley behind the house and spent many hours honing my skills behind the sights.

Nobody was ever harmed by me or my actions during the many years I was a firearms owner and I took my responsibilities very seriously, always having my guns stored securely with the bolts and ammo in a separate room, also under lock and key.

Basically, that's how 99.9 percent of all licensed firearms owners operate.

In the Stuff story, Labour police spokesperson Ginny Anderson is quoted as saying “It’s really concerning... that young people are able to use deadly weapons”.

What, you mean like cars?

How many people die on the roads as a result of younger drivers making poor decisions?

I don't know but I can guarantee you that it's orders of magnitude more than the number that kill others with a firearm.

Also, according to the story, there have been incidents of "of children using military-style semi-automatic (MSSA) firearms at gun clubs".

What's the problem with that?

I taught my kids how to *safely* use firearms from a very early age. This was for their safety as well as for the safety of those around them.

There are far too many stories out of countries like the USA where kids end up killing themselves or others because they were "playing around" with guns but had no idea what they were doing. Knowledge is safety so I showed my kids, including my 10-year-old daughter (at the time) how to safely load, unload and use a rifle. This meant that if she ever came across a situation involving a firearm, she was far better equipped to handle that situation safely.

To simply say "we must never allow children to handle firearms" reeks of knee-jerk ignorance on the part of those who would complain about such things and is a sorry indictment on the way our society is headed. Instead of educating kids and equipping them with the knowledge and skillsets they need to safely negotiate life's hazards, we seem to be opting to try and remove all such risks from their lives. That is an approach doomed to failure.

The situation across the ditch with respects to social media access for under 16-year-olds is a perfect example of this. Pretend that these kids won't find a way around the silly road-blocks to access and you're doing nobody a service Far better to prepare them for the rough-ride that social media can present and they'll be much more capable of dealing with those issues.

Ah well, it looks as if we're preparing for a new generation. We've had "boomers", millennials, Gen-X, Gen-Z and now we're creating "Generation-Snowflake", those who melt at the slightest sign of hardship, danger or risk.

Why would those in power promote such a thing? Could it be that it makes people easier to control when they've been raised to be afraid of their own shadow? Sigh!

Carpe Diem folks!

Please visit the sponsor!
Please visit the sponsor!

Here is a PERMANENT link to this column


Rank This Aardvark Page

 

Change Font

Sci-Tech headlines

 


Features:

The EZ Battery Reconditioning scam

Beware The Alternative Energy Scammers

The Great "Run Your Car On Water" Scam

 

Recent Columns

Energy, the new gold
Energy has always been of huge importance to mankind...

Donald Trump attempts time-travel
Today, a follow-up on a few recent columns...

You will never own it
"You will own nothing and be happy"...

The clock stops (TikTok)
The USA has gone through with its threat to ban TikTok within its borders...

Heat pumps fail the UK
The vast majority of Kiwi homes have heat pumps...

Tiktok or whackamole?
One of the earliest computer games was based on a Japanese arcade console called Whackamole...

Who remembers Slashdot?
Geeks are often found huddled together, at least in a virtual sense...

Watch out for Nvidia and Linux
Could 2025 be the year of the Linux desktop computer?...

Summer? Seriously?
It's time to talk weather...

Feet to the flames
As regular readers will know, I'm no stranger to battling bureacurats and rule-makers...