New Zealand's Leading Daily Net-News Online Publication |
Net-Industry NEWS! |
|
|
Publishing Internet News and Commentary since 1995
.
| ||
| ||
|
Dateline: 9 May 2000 Early Edition Read The Previous Edition A permanent link to this page can be found here
Editorial
Why not?
Well, unlike the US millionaire (who the NZ media is still not allowed to
name), the officer concerned has not been found guilty of any charges by
a court of law and, although successive NZ governments seem increasingly
keen on ignoring the fact -- people in a civilised country deserve the right
to be considered innocent until proven guilty.
None of us are privy to all the facts behind the incident so to play judge
and jury is totally unreasonable -- lets leave those who have the facts
at their disposal to do their job.
The court's decision to allow the media to name the policeman at the heart
of this issue simply makes the ongoing name suppression of the US drug-smuggling
millionaire even more ludicrous doesn't it?
The fact that The NZ Herald,
TVNZ and, so it would seem, the rest of the NZ media have chosen not to
publish the policeman's name even though they can, perhaps shows just how
out of touch our courts can be with public opinion.
Unfortunately, I have no doubt that some limelighting snot will try to exploit
this situation by posting the officer's name to a website or newsgroup somewhere --
but then again, there are people who'd happily try and wreck the entire utility
of the Internet by writing viruses aren't there?
The Identity Of That Virus Writer
According to the latest reports, a 27-year-old bank worker and his wife
(or girlfriend, depending on who you listen to) are being questioned in
relation to the virus attack.
Unfortunately, the Philippines police have already admitted that they may
not even be able to charge the pair because of the lack of cyber-crime laws in
that country.
Does that ring any bells in parliament? How long have I been trying to tell
successive governments that it's time the revamped their law-books to cope
with what can only be an increasing level of cybercrime with the potential
to extract an increasingly high toll on Net users?
Which kind of brings us back to our US millionaire again doesn't it -- if you
recall, at the time I linked to US news stories carrying his name, the best
the lawyers could do was run around in circles trying to figure out if it was
a breach of the name suppression order. Has anything changed yet?
Free republic-ation rights available
on request :-)
|
|
Aardvark Daily is a publication of, and is copyright to, Bruce Simpson, all rights reserved
|