Yesterday I suggested that I'm working on an article that I hope will provide
some analysis and insight into the growing number of new economy companies
which are publicly listed in New Zealand.
Well it looks as if Iguana have just launched an excellent new market index
called 4i and which can be found at the website
4 4i.co.nz.
Those smart guys at 4i have obviously been paying close attention because they
have made some smart marketing moves here.
First up -- note the domain name. Starts with a numeral, and a low ordered
numeral at that!
Secondly, they've produced some value-exchange brandware in the form of a
market index graphic that any other website can add to their own pages very
quickly and easily.
They're also being nicely reactive to early feedback -- working hard to get
around the way Netscape's rendering engine stutters and stalls on complex
table structures. Yes -- if you're a Netscape user running anything less than
a very fast Pentium III processor you probably get annoyed at the way sites
such as the NZHerald and Stuff.co.nz stall part-way through loading a page --
effectively freezing the entire browser for 10-15 seconds at a time.
Perhaps my only negative (and highly subjective) comment of the 4i service
would be that perhaps they've made the appearance of their brandware just a
little to cartoonish. At a time when it's still difficult for new economy
companies in NZ to win widespread recognition and support from the investor
community, I would have probably opted for a slightly more conservative
presentation -- to try and maximise the new index's credibility within the
"old school" with the fat wallets. Still, I guess they could offer the current
design plus a more conservative one for those sites that wanted to retain that
air of conservatism.
Overall though I'd have to say that this is an important, and not insignificant
step forward for what little new economy action there is in New Zealand. At last
we have a gauge by which we can measure the overall performance of those publicly
listed companies that are launching forth into this exciting new marketplace.
Where Is The Government?
Over the past week I've had at least five power cuts here. The fourth cut
was not a clean one -- the spikes blowing up a TV set that I was unable to
switch off in time. Also, due to the duration of the cuts and the fact that
I only had 5 litres of fuel for my generator, I had to shut down my computers
during the last one -- with the result that two of them would not restart and
required repairs. That sometimes happens when you run them for three or four years
without a power-down and then let them cool before restarting.
Of course this atrocious service comes just days after TransAlta announced that
they would be lifting the daily line-charge. So here I am, paying more for less.
When confronted, TransAlta say that the power cuts and resulting damage are not their
problem -- it's United Networks who manage the lines. United Networks say
that they are not responsible to me, or any other TransAlta customer, because my contract
is with TransAlta.
So... I'm left paying the bill for the damage caused because successive governments
could neither create nor fix an efficient electricity infrastructure in this
country.
Now we know this is a fiasco created by the previous government -- but why isn't
the present one doing something about it?
Why are United Networks about to spend $30m moving into the broadband data
market when they appear to be unable to fulfill their existing role as an
efficient, reliable, economic provider of electrical power circuits?
Given that the latest TransAlta line price-hike disadvantage the
low-income and elderly who can least afford to pay more, surely this "all caring,
all loving" government which purports to have a social conscience is delinquent
in its duty to protect that part of our community.
As always, your feedback is welcomed.