|
At last,
the contents of Aardvark's "million-dollar ideas" notebook
are revealed for all to see!
|
|
Intel has again announced the launch of some newer, faster processors designed
to give our desktop PCs even more horsepower than they already have.
However, the question has to be asked -- do we really need all this grunt?
Thanks to Moore's law, the average office PC now has more processing
speed, memory and disk storage than even the most expensive corporate
mainframe of just a few short decades ago -- but Intel, AMD and others
still keep trying to sell us faster chips.
Are we being conned by the chip-makers?
Or perhaps it's all Microsoft's fault for writing ever-larger, ever-slower
OSes and applications that simply replace fast code with fast silicon?
With Windows XP due out in October it would appear that once again people are
going to be faced with the choice of struggling on with last-year's PC or
once again investing in a bigger, better, brighter PC to keep up.
I suppose that PC gamers could be forgiven for staying on the cutting edge since
the latest games often place massive demands on processors and video-cards
in the quest for an ever more realistic experience. But then again -- maybe
a purpose-built gaming box such as the PS2 or the upcoming XBox is a
sensible alternative.
The sad truth is that for most people, a faster PC will allow your computer
to do one thing -- wait more quickly for your next command. Yes, unless
you're into very heavy number-crunching, most PCs spend 99% of their life
just waiting for the next keystroke or mouse-click -- so why spend thousands
of dollars a year just to have the "fastest waiting" PC on the block?
Personally, I tend to upgrade my PCs about once every three years -- and I
don't buy the fastest machine available, I buy the processor that offers
the best price/performance point. Hell, my main PC is a PII/400 and it's
now over 2 years old. About the only time I wish it were faster is when
I'm creating MPEG files -- but if I was doing this very often I'd by a
card with hardware MPEG encoding on it anyway.
What about YOU?
How often do you upgrade your PC and do you buy the "latest and greatest" or
the "best value" when you do?
Share your thoughts with me or Aardvark's readers.
Aardvark also makes a summary of this daily column available via XML using
the RSS format. More details can be found
here.