Reader Comments on Aardvark Daily 20 December 2002
Note: the comments below are the unabridged
submissions of readers and do
not necessarily reflect the opinions of the publisher.
From: Brett Herkt For : The Editor (for publication) Subj: Aardvark's article on Lmyree & Spam Dear Bruce I advise a correction to inaccurate information contained in your article on alleged Spam activity by Lmyree. I sent you an email via the contact form contained within your web-site on the same day your article was published and advised we would be following up the matter. We are disappointed that you have published further comment on Maxnet without contacting us to enquire about the actions we took. Maxnet contacted 123 Internet and were advised that a mistake had occurred and the email that had caused the Spam complaints had been sent in error. Maxnet further reviewed Lymree's web-site and determined that Lmyree could be offering Spam services but there was not sufficient evidence to be certain this was the case. Material on the Lmyree site actually discussed how to avoid spamming. We also considered that this was the first instance of a Spam complaint to Maxnet against either of these two organisations. We decided that 123 Internet and Lmyree deserved a warning and one chance to prove themselves. Our customer services manager then provided a written warning to 123 Internet to this effect. Maxnet would be pleased to receive your call or correspondence on any future matters of this nature. You may wish to publish a correction to the material contained on today's issue of Aardvark. Regards Brett Herkt General Manager Maximum Internet Limited
|
Aardvark Responds Why on earth do ISPs and hosting companies bother having "thou shalt not spam" clauses in their terms of service when what they really mean to say is "you can spam, but just the once, okay"? Hands up all those recipients who really believe Lymree's spam was sent by accident? And hands up those who would ever dare to download an MS Word document file with it's potential to carry a virus/worm payload (supposedly containing a don't-spam message) from a spammer's website? I'd certainly be interested in readers' comments on this question: Why should spammers, who are obliged to read (and therefore accept) the hosting company or ISPs terms of service, be allowed to spam with impunity, so long as it's only the once? If they spam (even once) then they have either:
|
From: Philip D'Ath For : The Editor (for publication) Subj: Xtra - pop3 Access Xtra have just blocked pop3 access to anyone outside of their network! So if you have a DSL account not with Xtra, you can't retrieve your email anymore. If you dial up via another ISP, you can't retrieve your email anymore. If you travel overseas, you can't pick up your email anymore (without paying high roaming charges). They have done this with zero warning! I have had calls from many upset people. From: John Gillon For : The Editor (for publication) Subj: Xtra - pop3 Access Thanks for the explanation Philip, now I know why we couldn't receive mail via DSL all of yesterday! Our ISP thought it may have been some problem with Xtra's POP3 routing for DSL connections... some problem huh! I have confirmed with Xtra's help desk that the non-Xtra DSL access blocking change took place at 0900 20-Dec. Damn arrogant I reckon, and it will stymie all of what you say, and timed perfectly to annoy all those dedicated types that collect business e-mail from home ADSL whilst on holiday. I wonder when they block dial-up connections! Merry Christmas from Xtra - baaagh, humbug! From: John Gillon For : The Editor (for publication) Subj: Xtra ToU- e-mail 3. Email service use To be entitled to use our email service (whether to receive, access, view or send any email (or part of any email)), you need to have either: An active Internet access account with Xtra and you, personally, must be connected through that account at the time of using our email service. Or: Use XtraMail or such other email access or hosting service offered or specifically approved by Xtra from time to time. The fact you may, at some time, have been able to use Xtra's email services through services other than Xtra Internet access or XtraMail does not necessarily mean that it is a service offered or specifically approved by Xtra. Additionally, Xtra may add to, replace, block or remove alternative access or hosting services previously offered or approved by Xtra without notice to you. From: James For : The Editor (for publication) Subj: Sony quality problems I can't believe how arrogant Sony are, by not even acknowledging the issue of the recent unreliability of products manufactured within the last 5 years. I have realised that the quality/reliability problems with some Sony products, have a lot to do where the product is made. I have a Sony Trinitron 1987 that is still working well, and it was made in West Germany! I purchased a Sony Trinitron 3 years ago which has now just started developing problems, and it was made in Malaysia. I have a sony minisytem about 7 years old, still working fine, and made in Japan. My friend has one about two years old, and has started developing crackling sounds when playing CD's.(made in Malaysia.) I am certainly going to base my future decisions on which sony product to buy, by basing it on where it is made. I believe products still made in Japan are better quality, than products made in Asian countries outside of Japan, I will probably go for a different cheaper brand, as they are probably made in the same factory anyway. The fact is the quality just isn’t there, and whats the point of buying a Sony product, if it is low quality. I don't know where all Sony products are made, but here are where some of them are made. Sony TV's, made in Malaysia Sony VCRs, made in Malaysia Sony LCD Monitors, made in Thailand Sony Digital cameras, made in Japan (at least the high end versions are, I suspect the cheaper models are, or will soon be made in a third world country soon) Sony have also recently decreased the warranty period on some of their products from 3years to 2 years, and from 2 years to 1 year, depending on the product. This is perhaps due to the reliability problems, and where there products are now manufactured. Although Sony have moved much of their manufacturing to third world asian countries to cut manufacturing costs, the price they charge for their products certainly hasn’t gone down, to reflect the savings they are making by cheaper manufacturing. (At least not in NZ) I should add that the price NZers pay for Sony products is far more in comparison , than what people in other countries pay. The NZ Sony importers are obviously onto a good thing. Sony aren't the only ones who are now manufacturing their products in 3rd world asian countries, to cut manufacturing costs. HP are now also manufacturing much of their hardware in China, when it used to be made in Japan. Needless to say the Chinese HP products are flimsy, and feel cheap. Unfortunately this seems to be the way these all these (good name) manufacturers are heading, and there isn’t a heck of a lot we can do about it, apart from not buying them.Hit Reload For Latest Comments
Now Have Your Say
Home | Today's Headlines | Contact | New Sites | Job Centre | Investment Centre