Note: This column represents the opinions
of the writer and as such, is not purported as fact
Sponsor's Message
|
Let's wrap up this whole broadband/Telecom thing.
On the one side we've got Telecom and Business NZ claiming that recent
surveys put its offerings right up there with the best in the world -- in
terms of price and speed.
Of course the fact that the chairman of Business NZ also just happens to
be a member of Telecom's board was not very well publicised was it?
This kind of sleight of hand is rife throughout the entire Telecom spin
on the matter so some of Theresa's claims need some deeper investigation
before we can see the facts.
The broadband benchmark survey that Theresa and Business NZ have been
referring to was commissioned by Business NZ and I have a feeling that
its results may have been badly biased by accepting the company's spin
at face value. Could this be one of those surveys where the commissioner
presents the results and then asks the survey company to come up with
data to suit?
Now have your say
|
Got something to say about today's column, or want to see what
others think?
Visit The Forums
While you're here, why not visit the Aardvark
Hall of Shame
and perhaps make your own nomination. 7
|
|
First-up, what about speed?
Yes, 3.5Mbps is a very respectable speed by today's standards and so we should
all be very pleased and accept this as a great step forward by Telecom -- right?
Wrong!
Read the fine-print and you'll find that we'll get *up to* 3.5Mbps but in reality,
are almost never going to get even close to this figure.
Why?
A little thing called the contention ratio -- which is the number of people who
are all vying for a single piece of bandwidth. If absolutely nobody else is
trying to use that bandwidth you might just hit 3.5Mbps but the odds of that
happening are very remote because most of the time you'll be just one of
more than 140 users each getting a tiny slice of the pie.
In virtually all other countries this contention ratio is far, far lower than
that offered by Telecom. Given the number of Kiwis that have to share a pipe,
Telecom could offer 10Mbps and it wouldn't cost them a penny more -- because
the actual difference in speed experienced by users would be imperceptible.
Some of the information I've read indicates that the actual amount of bandwidth
guaranteed per DSL user is as low as 24Kpbs -- that's less than dial-up!
So, although Telecom are claiming we're as fast as the rest of the world, the
reality is that we're still way slower. Think of Telecom's broadband as
a Ferrari fitted with such a small fuel-line that it starves and falters when
you try to go over 100Km/H. A fast car with a very powerful motor -- yes, but
one that can't realise anything like its full potential because its fuel supply
is choked to death.
Then there's the issue of data-caps.
Telecom doesn't actually like to talk about the size of its caps or how they
compare with the rest of the world -- and there's good reason for that.
Data caps are an anathema to the whole concept of the Net -- an awful restriction
on an otherwise unfettered medium.
The very idea of a broadband connection which imposes a data-cap of just 200MB
is almost unbelievable in this day and age -- so why even bother with such a
lunatic option?
Simple -- it lets Telecom crow about offering DSL packages that are as cheap
as anywhere in the world -- even if the reality is that they're virtually
unusable as a general-purpose connection due to that tiny cap.
So it's no wonder that a carefully crafted survey commissioned by a decidedly
biased party (Business NZ) can produce a report that puts them in a favourable
light.
Let's hope however (perhaps in vain) that our politicians aren't swayed by
this biased document based on taking spin at face-value and instead look
at the real facts before deciding what to do.
Tell us all and see what others have to say in
The Aardvark Forums
Yes, You Can Gift Money
I've published this website for the past nine years as a service to the
local internet and IT industry and during all that time it has been 100%
free to access. It is my intention to ensure that it remains completely
free and free of charge and contains only the most sparse levels of advertising.
Aardvark is not a business, it is a free resource.
If you feel that this is a good thing and/or you hold a "geniune affection"
for yours truly -- then you are welcome to gift me some
money using the buttons provided. In gifting this money you accept that no goods,
service or other consideration is offered, provided, accepted or anticipated in return.
Just click on the button to gift whatever you can afford.
NOTE: PayPal bills in US dollars so don't accidentally gift more than
what you were intending :-)
Contacting Aardvark
I'm always happy to hear from readers, whether they're delivering brickbats,
bouquets or news tip-offs.
If you'd like to contact me directly, please
this form. If you're happy for me to republish
your comments then please be sure and select For Publication.
Other media organisations seeking more information or republication rights
are also invited to contact me.
Add Aardvark To Your Own Website!
Got a moment? Want a little extra fresh content for your own website or
page?
Just add a
couple of lines of JavaScript
to your pages and you can get
a free summary of Aardvark's daily commentary -- automatically updated
each and every week-day.
Aardvark also makes a summary of this daily column available via XML using
the RSS format. More details can be found
here.
Contact me if you decide to use either of these feeds and
have any problems.
Linking Policy
Want to link to this site? Check out Aardvark's
Linking Policy.
|
Did you tell someone else about Aardvark today? If not then do it
now!
|
|