Google
 

Aardvark Daily

The world's longest-running online daily news and commentary publication, now in its 30th year. The opinion pieces presented here are not purported to be fact but reasonable effort is made to ensure accuracy.

Content copyright © 1995 - 2025 to Bruce Simpson (aka Aardvark), the logo was kindly created for Aardvark Daily by the folks at aardvark.co.uk



Please visit the sponsor!
Please visit the sponsor!

China, our new energy overlord?

3 September 2009

Huge amounts of effort and money are being spent to avert what some claim will be a run-away catastrophic global warming that threatens all life on the planet.

We're told that our carbon-belching lifestyle is largely responsible for an unprecedented increase in temperatures and dramatic changes in weather patterns that may have already reached "tipping point".

In our efforts to try and avert such disaster, we've been switching from fossil fuel to wind, solar and other forms of non-polluting energy.

Indeed, there are those who believe that the electric vehicle (EV) is already a practical alternative to the traditional fossil-fueled cars we presently drive. Their plan is to have us all weaned off our gas-guzzlers and humming along in our fuel-cell or battery-powered vehicles within a decade or two.

That would be possible -- except for one very important thing...

It seems that the energy and dollar-cost of these vehicles may be about to rise significantly, mainly due to the dent they're making in the supplies of some raw materials.

Regardless of the actual power-source used to create the electricity that drives an EV, they all have small, very efficient electric motors that convert that electrical energy into force and work.

A key to the lightweight and efficiency of these electric motors is the use of "rare earth magnets".

When I was a kid, all we had were steel and alnico magnets. They were weak and little more than a novelty. Even the most powerful permanent-magnet electric motor was heavy and produced very little power.

Then came a new generation of magnets based on ferrite particles. These were much stronger, but still only produced engines with a modest power output and mediocre efficiencies.

It wasn't until "super" magnets were developed using rare-earth elements such as cobalt, neodymium and the like that we got real power and efficiency.

Now the term "rare earth" may give you a clue as to the problem that's just waiting to ankle-tap our plans to fill the world with EVs instead of gas-guzzlers.

Unfortunately, these super-magnet metals are not found in abundance in any economically useful form. You won't find a seam of neodymium ore in the same way you find gold or silver concentrated into a rich vein.

Because they're so reactive, these metals tend to be spread sparsely, compounded into trace elements and this means they can be very expensive (both in terms of energy and money) to extract and refine.

If we were to try and create an EV fleet using neodymium magnets, the demand for this metal would significantly outstrip supply right now and, even if we did increase production, the environmental and energy costs would be significant.

It's not only electric motors that use these metals either. Just as rare-earth magnets make for the most efficient motors, they also make for far more efficient electricity generators.

As we move increasingly towards wind-generators, a further demand will be placed on the mining and refining of these metals.

The price of neodymium has already increased from US$8/kg in 2005 to a peak of US$150/kg in 2007 and there's no indication that this escalation won't continue as demand grows at an exponential rate. Indeed, in a global economy that's increasingly driven by concern over global warming, neodymium futures may be a very worthwhile and lucrative investment for someone with a bit of cash to spare.

It's also worth noting that much of the world's reserve of neodymium oxide is found in China, something that could make them the "Middle East of electrical energy". This would make them to rare-earth magnets what Saudi Arabia, Iraq and similar countries are to oil.

So, until we have a better indication as to just how much energy, environmental damage and cost is involved in electrifying our vehicle fleet and building all those wind-generators we need to reduce our reliance on fossil fuels, perhaps we ought not get too carried away with touting electricity as the fossil-fuel alternative.

Please visit the sponsor!
Please visit the sponsor!

Have your say on this...

PERMALINK to this column

Oh, and don't forget today's sci/tech news headlines


Rank This Aardvark Page

 

Change Font

Sci-Tech headlines

 


Features:

The EZ Battery Reconditioning scam

Beware The Alternative Energy Scammers

The Great "Run Your Car On Water" Scam

 

Recent Columns

Are things getting silly?
It's been a while since I wrote a purely political column so I'll address that shortfall today...

Space, the final frontier of war?
The USA just admitted that it has done a bit of waring in space...

Time to make some stuff
I miss making stuff...

The real reason behind the AI cautions
AI companies are calling for a pause in development and the implementation of stronger controls on their industry...

The cost of everything
This Kiwi summer could be an expensive one...

It costs how much?
Yesterday was a big day for the Apple fanboys...

Big brother gets worse
George Orwell's prophecies continue to play out in 2026...

You are not the customer, you are the product
There are a lot of free services on the internet...

Hobbies are dead
Wow, I've had a lot of emails and comments over the past few hours from people lamenting the death of hobbies...

The world has gone mad
This morning I reluctantly got out my credit card and paid stupid-high money for a portable hard disk drive...