Google
 

Aardvark Daily

New Zealand's longest-running online daily news and commentary publication, now in its 25th year. The opinion pieces presented here are not purported to be fact but reasonable effort is made to ensure accuracy.

Content copyright © 1995 - 2019 to Bruce Simpson (aka Aardvark), the logo was kindly created for Aardvark Daily by the folks at aardvark.co.uk



Please visit the sponsor!
Please visit the sponsor!

Court: Kodi streams OK, caching not

13 July 2018

Some time ago, SkyTV took a case to court claiming that preloaded Kodi boxes were illegal and breached copyright.

Well yesterday a district court ruled on that case and although you probably won't be surprised that the court sided with SkyTV, you may be surprised to find out exactly how this decision was arrived at.

The judge in this case ruled "that people who had bought Kodi boxes from Fibre TV were breaking the Copyright Act because copyright-infringing content would be cached on the devices before it was watched".

That's right... the "gotcha" is not that the streaming itself is illegal but that the material is cached before it's passed on to the TV set.

How does that work?

Doesn't our copyright Act allow immunity for cached copies of protected works?

Well it does, and it doesn't.

I have to take my hat off to our law-makers in this case. They were clearly thinking ahead when they devised section 43A of The Copyright Act 1994.

This piece of the act very clearly states:

A reproduction of a work does not infringe copyright in the work if the reproduction

  • (a) is transient or incidental; and
  • (b) is an integral and essential part of a technological process for --
    • (i) making or receiving communication that does not infringe copyright; or
    • (ii) enabling the lawful use of, or lawful dealing in, the work

So you see... if you're legitimately watching a YouTube, Netflix or other stream which contains protected material you have a right to view then the cache on your computer, smartphone, Kodi box or whatever is non-infringing.

However, the moment you start watching a pirated stream or stream a movie without license from the copyright holder, your cache becomes an unlawful and infringing copy.

Cunning eh?

But in that case, isn't your ISP and all the others in the long chain from the source of the stream and your own player also infringing?

Maybe, maybe not.

Section 92E of the Copyright Act 1994 provides a degree of exemption for ISPs (who can't be expected to know if the stuff they're carrying and potentially caching is actually legal or not) but it does include a clause 92.1.b which states:

An Internet service provider does not infringe copyright in a work by caching material if the internet service provider -- complies with any conditions imposed by the copyright owner of the material for access to that material

This is perhaps one area where the Act might need a bit of of a tidy-up. An ISP can not know if a packet of data is protected by copyright and therefore they can't know the terms of that copyright so as to ensure they are compliant.

Naturally, we'd expect the courts to take this into account when examining any prosecution alleging that, by caching illegal material, an ISP was guilty of a breach of the Act. However, as we all know, justice increasingly goes to the party with the biggest wallet so if one of the rich movie studios or music publishers decided to accuse an ISP of violating copyright even though they were packet-agnostic, the Act would seemingly provide no protection for the ISP in such cases.

So am I going to stop using my Kodi box?

Hell no because, as we all know, I only use it to watch YouTube videos anyway.

Please visit the sponsor!
Please visit the sponsor!

Have your say in the Aardvark Forums.

PERMALINK to this column


Rank This Aardvark Page

 

Change Font

Sci-Tech headlines

 


Features:

Beware The Alternative Energy Scammers

The Great "Run Your Car On Water" Scam

 

Recent Columns

FUD, the ultimate marketing tool
Thanks to the wonders of the internet and a copyright-breaching upload to YouTube, last night I watched the BBC Panorama documentary on the drone scare at Gatwick airport which took place last Christmas...

VPNs the boom and the ban
VPNs (Virtual Private Networks) are an important part of the modern internet and it looks as if they are going to become even more essential in the coming months and years...

Let's do this thing!
Last week I wrote about my idea to decentralise the business of user-generated online content...

Another step towards 1984
All journeys start and end with a single step...

Google - what laws?
We all know about Google's "clever" strategies for reducing their tax burden in most countries...

A ban on crypto-mining?
With the boom in crypto-currencies, the world has become acutely aware that your Bitcoin or other unit of exchange can actually be rather expensive to mine, certainly from an energy perspective...

Time for Huawei to emigrate?
Huawei has become one of the largest and most powerful manufacturers of communications technology in the 21st century...

Who do you believe?
I think everyone is well aware of the fiasco that was the rigging of emission tests by the likes of VW and other European diesel car makers a year or two ago...

You can't fix "stupid"
Just a brief column today because I have a pretty hectic schedule ahead of me before the sun sets on this week...

Why should we feel ashamed?
Since it seems that talking about the Christchurch mosque shootings is verboten on just about every social media platform or in the comments section of our news websites I figured there's only one place left for me (and you) to have your say...

Why EVs are essential to NZ's energy future
When the Tesla Roadster first appeared on the market, I was skeptical... very skeptical...