Note: This column represents the opinions
of the writer and as such, is not purported as fact
Sponsor's Message
|
The SMS service, or texting as it's become more commonly known, has become
a large part of many people's lives -- especially if you're a busy teenager.
From a Telco's perspective, SMS must be a real money-spinner -- you get
paid up to 20 cents for moving just a small handful of bytes from one
phone to another.
In fact, if you assume that the average SMS message is probably just 50 bytes
or less, that 20 cent price tag comes to a massive $4,000 per megabyte. Boy,
that makes Telecom's over-cap DSL rates look like a bargain doesn't it?
What's even better is that SMS isn't a realtime product. There's no guarantee
that your SMS message will be delivered within a second, a minute or even an
hour. This allows Telcos to simply queue SMS messages when the network gets
really busy, delivering them as and when gaps appear in the flow of voice
traffic.
The Aardvark PC-Based Digital
Entertainment Centre Project
Yes, at last, this feature
has been updated again! (31 Mar 2003)
Perhaps now we can see why Telecom mobile is able to offer a $10/month
flat-rate texting service and why, in Australia, Vodafone recently changed
their voice-call charging structure so that very short voice calls are
no longer cheaper than SMS messages.
But SMS remains a very convenient way to communicate with people and its
non-realtime characteristics are sometimes an asset. Like email, you
can send an SMS happy in the knowledge that even if the recipient
has their phone turned off or is otherwise occupied, the message will
eventually be read.
However, when I was in the USA earlier this year I saw something that might
just go a long way towards replacing the SMS service.
To understand why this new service might be a winner you have to consider
the single biggest drawback to SMS: thumb-stress!
Let's face it -- keying out an SMS of any significant value using your thumb
is a slow and tedious process even if you are a one-fingered-wonder.
The SMS-killer may well be something as simple as a version of voice-mail.
Instead of growing callouses on your thumb by bashing away at those tiny
little buttons, you simply select the number you wish to communicate with,
hold down the talk button and -- well -- talk!
At the recipient's end, an alert (like the SMS alert) sounds and they
simply hit a key to start listening. The volume on the phones I saw
could be turned up to the point where you didn't need to hold the phone
to your ear in this mode.
Do you remember the old walkie-talkies or CB Radios of the 1970's?
Well that's just how this system works -- press to talk, release to listen.
Let's look at the benefits of this CB-radio mode of operation:
Firstly, if the party being called isn't available or their phone
is turned off, the sender's message can be stored and delivered as soon
as the phone comes online again and is free -- just like an SMS.
Secondly, this service only uses half the bandwidth because only one
party is able to talk at a time.
Thirdly, it's not really realtime - just close to it. This means that
CB-radio-mode packets can be given a lower-priority than full voice calls
and that allows a lot more work to be squeezed out existing bandwidth.
But for people like me, the biggest bonus has to be that I don't have to
spend half an hour thumbing out a short message in broken English on a
keyboard the size of a grain of rice.
From a billing perspective -- you can be charged only for the amount of time
you spend holding down the talk button -- so in a conversation, the person
who talks the longest pays the most and in most cases the cost of a call
will be shared by both parties.
If you don't want to share the cost of a call with someone you don't know
or don't like -- just ignore their call alert and it doesn't cost you a
penny.
If/when such an innovation appears here in NZ, would you find it more
convenient than SMS?
Where was Friday's Aardvark?
Don't ask! Friday was a total disaster on numerous fronts but fear not,
things appear to have returned to some semblance of order once again.
If any Aardvark readers want to share an opinion on today's column or
add something, you're invited to chip in and have your say in
The Aardvark Forums or, if you prefer,
you can contact me directly.
Yes, You Can Donate
Although the very kind folks at iHug continue to generously sponsor the
publication of Aardvark, the bills still exceed the income by a fairly
significant amount. It is with this in mind therefore that I'm once
again soliciting donations from anyone who feels they're getting some
value from this daily column and news index. I've gone the PayPal
way of accepting donations because the time involved in processing a bunch
of little credit-card billings sometimes exceeds the monetary value they
represent. Just click on the button to donate whatever you can afford.
NOTE: PayPal bills in US dollars so don't accidentally donate twice
what you were intending :-)
Contacting Aardvark
I'm always happy to hear from readers, whether they're delivering brickbats,
bouquets or news tip-offs.
If you'd like to contact me directly, please
this form. If you're happy for me to republish
your comments then please be sure and select For Publication.
Other media organisations seeking more information or republication rights
are also invited to contact me.
Add Aardvark To Your Own Website!
Got a moment? Want a little extra fresh content for your own website or
page?
Just add a
couple of lines of JavaScript
to your pages and you can get
a free summary of Aardvark's daily commentary -- automatically updated
each and every week-day.
Aardvark also makes a summary of this daily column available via XML using
the RSS format. More details can be found
here.
Contact me if you decide to use either of these feeds and
have any problems.
Linking Policy
Want to link to this site? Check out Aardvark's
Linking Policy.
|
Did you tell someone else about Aardvark today? If not then do it
now!
|
|
|