Note: This column represents the opinions
of the writer and as such, is not purported as fact
Sponsor's Message
|
Yes, it's true -- I'm so old that I still often think of distances in
miles rather than kilometers. However, for those who entered the educational
system after metrication, you can read the title of today's column as
"The Most Expensive 2400 Kms in the World?"
But what am I talking about?
I refer of course, to the relatively short gap that separates New Zealand
from its neighbour, Australia.
It has long been known that the cost of shipping freight across this little
expanse of ocean is very high, by world standards. However, it seems that
the advent of the Internet and a shift to the transfer of bits and bytes
rather than boxes and bins has changed nothing.
The Aardvark PC-Based Digital
Entertainment Centre Project
Yes, at last, this feature
has been updated again! (31 Mar 2003)
We're talking about broadband charges again (of course).
Based on Telecom's pricing structure for DSL, I can only assume that
traffic sent from here to Australia (or the other way) does not actually
take the shortest route (that 2400Kms). It would appear that it must
surely go the long way -- zipping past the tip of South America and weaving
around the bottom of the African continent.
That's the only explanation I can come up with for justifying Telecom's
over-cap DSL bandwidth between the two countries.
The reason I suggest this is due to Telstra's decision to remove data caps
on many of its DSL services in Australia.
Now we know that Telecom keeps telling us that their 20c/MB is a fair and
reasonable charge for international traffic (but what about the LOCAL traffic
at speeds over 128bps????) -- justifying this claim with the reminder that
we're so very far from the rest of the world and long data links are expensive.
Here's a question for Telecom then: Since Australia is only 2400Kms closer
to "the rest of the world", how come Telstra's DSL users now get UNCAPPED
broadband at 256Kbps download speeds for as little as A$69.95 and 512Kbps
download speeds for just A$99.95?
Hands up all the NZers who'd jump at the chance for such a cost-effective
uncapped service.
So, given that Telecom's 20c/MB over-cap data charges apply to traffic that
goes to and from Australia, yet Aussies can get such a great deal on
uncapped broadband to the rest of the world -- the only logical conclusion
is that it's the short hop across the ditch that's the problem.
Perhaps Telecom could offer us uncapped broadband by simply blocking all the trans-Tasman
traffic, you know -- that really expensive stuff.
Of course you know I'm just kidding.
The real difference between Australia and NZ is not that miniscule 2400Kms,
it's the fact that Telstra has *competition* in the Australian DSL market so
they have to be more realistic about their pricing.
And, as a final data-point, it's very interesting to note that despite the
huge amount of money Telecom claims it's pouring into making its DSL services
more accessible around the country -- they still made a very healthy profit
from JetStream. In most other situations, rapid growth requires companies to
operate at a loss as investment exceeds revenue. That this isn't the case
with Telecom's DSL services surely indicates that they have a truly
massive margin in place.
However, the most interesting time for Telecom will be February of next year.
Long after the tinsel has been taken down and the left-over ham consumed,
parents all around the country will get a reminder of the festive season
in the form of their Telecom bill. There, as a shining example of
just how a capped DSL service can ruin your day (and your bank-balance), will be the results of
little Johnny's all-day, all-night sessions using X-Box live through Telecom's
256Kbps DSL service. Owch!
I sure hope they're adding extra staff to the call centre for that one!
If any Aardvark readers want to share an opinion on today's column or
add something, you're invited to chip in and have your say in
The Aardvark Forums or, if you prefer,
you can contact me directly.
Yes, You Can Donate
Although the very kind folks at iHug continue to generously sponsor the
publication of Aardvark, the bills still exceed the income by a fairly
significant amount. It is with this in mind therefore that I'm once
again soliciting donations from anyone who feels they're getting some
value from this daily column and news index. I've gone the PayPal
way of accepting donations because the time involved in processing a bunch
of little credit-card billings sometimes exceeds the monetary value they
represent. Just click on the button to donate whatever you can afford.
NOTE: PayPal bills in US dollars so don't accidentally donate twice
what you were intending :-)
Contacting Aardvark
I'm always happy to hear from readers, whether they're delivering brickbats,
bouquets or news tip-offs.
If you'd like to contact me directly, please
this form. If you're happy for me to republish
your comments then please be sure and select For Publication.
Other media organisations seeking more information or republication rights
are also invited to contact me.
Add Aardvark To Your Own Website!
Got a moment? Want a little extra fresh content for your own website or
page?
Just add a
couple of lines of JavaScript
to your pages and you can get
a free summary of Aardvark's daily commentary -- automatically updated
each and every week-day.
Aardvark also makes a summary of this daily column available via XML using
the RSS format. More details can be found
here.
Contact me if you decide to use either of these feeds and
have any problems.
Linking Policy
Want to link to this site? Check out Aardvark's
Linking Policy.
|
Did you tell someone else about Aardvark today? If not then do it
now!
|
|
|