Note: This column represents the opinions
of the writer and as such, is not purported as fact
Sponsor's Message
|
Christmas Edition
This column has been published half a day early because of the importance
of its subject matter. If you missed Tuesday's column, just hit
this link.
Just a few short months ago it began to look as if the prospect of lower-cost
DSL services was just around the corner, spurred by the seemingly certain
unbundling of the local loop in the wake of a draft Commerce Commission
report suggesting such a move.
However, in a move that defies logic and smacks of cronyism, the Commerce
Commission has announced that it's changed its mind and is now believes that
unbundling is not the answer.
Now I know that The CC has always been reluctant to upset Telecom in the past,
but surely someone must be sleeping with someone at the highest level for
this type of about-face and sheer lunacy to prevail?
Just what was the reason given for denying true and open competition
in the provision of DSL services to NZ consumers?
The Aardvark PC-Based Digital
Entertainment Centre Project
Yes, at last, this feature
has been updated again! (31 Mar 2003)
Well the Telecommunications Commissioner, Douglas Webb has been quoted as
saying that "The Commission is no longer recommending
unbundling of the local loop, because of what we have
learnt about the costs and difficulties of that solution in
comparison with the potential benefits".
Now doesn't that sound like a Telecom press release?
The CC would have us believe that, despite its recommendation not to force unbundling,
competition in the DSL marketplace can be created by way of requiring
Telecom to sell its DSL services to other players at a wholesale
level.
Err... excuse me.. but this still leaves Telecom with a huge amount of
control over the costs that any competitor will have to pay to deliver
their connectivity to the customer.
This is patently ridiculous and still leaves Telecom with its monopoly on
the last mile.
Now, while I'd really like to believe that Telecom would provide their
DSL service to competitors at fair and reasonable rate -- honest I would, but I really don't
think it will happen. It might be tempting to think that through such
a wholesaling arrangement, other ISPs could finally offer flat-rate broadband
-- or at least povide a far more cost-effective service than Telecom presently does -- but it's
just not going to happen.
The reason why Telecom has been charging up to 20c/MB for *local* traffic
delivered via JetStream is now very apparent. By doing this, they can
claim that the cost of opeating the DSL segment is linked to the number of MB delivered
and thus, if forced to wholesale the service, can effectively
demand a per-MB wholesale fee from competitors who only want access to DSL
to bridge that last mile.
And one only has to look at the huge amount of acriomony and delay that was
involved in the negotiation of a reasonable interconnect rate when
Telecom was forced to work with competitors in the POTS (plain Old Telephone
System) market to realise that the chances of competitors getting an even
break on the wholesale rates are remote. Does the CC really believe that somehow DSL will be
different and Telecom will instantly become fair, ethical and reasonable
in its attitude to striking a wholesale rate?
Of course we should remember that this is only a recommendation to government
and, if Jim Anderton, Paul Swain and their budies have half an ounce of
commonsense, they'll ignore it and persue the unbundling option.
Oh dear -- after re-reading that sentence I can't help but feel we're
about to be stuck with one of the world's most expensive DSL services
for the forseeable future.
The government really ought to think very carefully about this decisions.
While it might be so much easier to simply take the CC's advice and
leave Telecom with its monopoly, to do so would represent a huge political
gamble that might well drive even more of this country's best and brightest
into the arms of more tech-friendly countries.
What do you think?
If any Aardvark readers want to share an opinion on today's column or
add something, you're invited to chip in and have your say in
The Aardvark Forums or, if you prefer,
you can contact me directly.
Yes, You Can Donate
Although the very kind folks at iHug continue to generously sponsor the
publication of Aardvark, the bills still exceed the income by a fairly
significant amount. It is with this in mind therefore that I'm once
again soliciting donations from anyone who feels they're getting some
value from this daily column and news index. I've gone the PayPal
way of accepting donations because the time involved in processing a bunch
of little credit-card billings sometimes exceeds the monetary value they
represent. Just click on the button to donate whatever you can afford.
NOTE: PayPal bills in US dollars so don't accidentally donate twice
what you were intending :-)
Contacting Aardvark
I'm always happy to hear from readers, whether they're delivering brickbats,
bouquets or news tip-offs.
If you'd like to contact me directly, please
this form. If you're happy for me to republish
your comments then please be sure and select For Publication.
Other media organisations seeking more information or republication rights
are also invited to contact me.
Add Aardvark To Your Own Website!
Got a moment? Want a little extra fresh content for your own website or
page?
Just add a
couple of lines of JavaScript
to your pages and you can get
a free summary of Aardvark's daily commentary -- automatically updated
each and every week-day.
Aardvark also makes a summary of this daily column available via XML using
the RSS format. More details can be found
here.
Contact me if you decide to use either of these feeds and
have any problems.
Linking Policy
Want to link to this site? Check out Aardvark's
Linking Policy.
|
Did you tell someone else about Aardvark today? If not then do it
now!
|
|
|