Note: This column represents the opinions
of the writer and as such, is not purported as fact
Sponsor's Message
|
I've always been annoyed at the way the Net is painted by the media on a slow
news day.
Check out this story
on the BBC website for example.
In my opinion, it's a really bad piece of journalism that offers the reader
no real information but creates what may well be a decidedly misleading
perception.
Take this quote for example:
"Experts believe the availability of images of children could be encouraging
people to commit actual abuse".
What does that tell us?
It tells us that experts don't know whether there's any link between kiddy
porn online and actual offending -- but note carefully that it's worded in
such a way as to create the perception that a link does exist.
The Aardvark PC-Based Digital
Entertainment Centre Project
Yes, at last, this feature
has been updated again! (31 Mar 2003)
Well if there is a link -- where's the evidence?
Hell, I could publish a story in which I stated "a number of people believe
that the increased availability of online pornography is a factor in reducing
the incidence of sexual offending" -- and this would be just as meaningless
and misleading.
Even the claim that the Net has produced a 1,500% increase in kiddy porn crimes
since 1988 is misleading.
How does anyone know?
Are they telling us that all child-porn crimes are detected, reported and
prosecuted? What about all those child-porn crimes that have occurred without
the authorities being aware?
I have no doubt that the Net has made it a whole lot easier for people to
access kiddy-porn -- but it's also made it a whole lot easier for authorities
to detect, track and prosecute offenders.
The article should have stated that Net use has lead to a 1,500% increase
in the number of crimes detected or prosecuted.
There is another claim that appears to be unsubstantiated by any formal
research: "anyone who looked at child porn had to be considered at least
a potential "hands-on" paedophile".
Is there any evidence to support this claim?
I'm sure this is true -- but no truer than this claim: "every person using
the Net is a potential
paedophile and in the case of men, the potential for offending is even greater"
Without some kind of evidence produced by scientifically conducted study, these types
of statements are not too different from the extremist feminist claim that
"all men are rapists".
Now let me make it quite clear that I'm not for one minute making a stand
on behalf of kiddy-porn merchants or sexual offenders -- but I am really
concerned that the media has once again jumped on the bandwagon which
makes it so easy to paint the Net as an evil place and refuge of dirty old
men in raincoats.
I can't think of one other subject which would produce this type of atrocious
journalism by an otherwise reputable news organisation.
It's almost as if the media are saying "we know the public despise kiddy porn
so let's ignore all the normal journalistic checks and balances designed to
ensure our objectivity."
I have to say that I've lost a great deal of respect for the BBC as a news
organisation. A decade or so ago they were extremely good but during my
time at 7am.com I noticed a rapid decline in their journalistic standards
and objectivity. This decline appears not to have yet been arrested.
If it's subjective, biased, bad reporting people want, they can find that
in buckets on the Net. Surely there's no sense in the BBC trying to compete
in the tabloid marketplace is there?
If any Aardvark readers want to share an opinion on today's column or
add something, you're invited to chip in and have your say in
The Aardvark Forums or, if you prefer,
you can contact me directly.
Yes, You Can Gift Money
I've published this website for the past nine years as a service to the
local internet and IT industry and during all that time it has been 100%
free to access. It is my intention to ensure that it remains completely
free and free of charge and contains only the most sparse levels of advertising.
Aardvark is not a business, it is a free resource.
If you feel that this is a good thing -- then you are welcome to gift me some
money using the buttons provided. In gifting this money you accept that no goods,
service or other consideraiton is offered, provided or accepted in return for this gift.
Just click on the button to gift whatever you can afford.
NOTE: PayPal bills in US dollars so don't accidentally gift twice
what you were intending :-)
Contacting Aardvark
I'm always happy to hear from readers, whether they're delivering brickbats,
bouquets or news tip-offs.
If you'd like to contact me directly, please
this form. If you're happy for me to republish
your comments then please be sure and select For Publication.
Other media organisations seeking more information or republication rights
are also invited to contact me.
Add Aardvark To Your Own Website!
Got a moment? Want a little extra fresh content for your own website or
page?
Just add a
couple of lines of JavaScript
to your pages and you can get
a free summary of Aardvark's daily commentary -- automatically updated
each and every week-day.
Aardvark also makes a summary of this daily column available via XML using
the RSS format. More details can be found
here.
Contact me if you decide to use either of these feeds and
have any problems.
Linking Policy
Want to link to this site? Check out Aardvark's
Linking Policy.
|
Did you tell someone else about Aardvark today? If not then do it
now!
|
|
|