Note: This column represents the opinions
of the writer and as such, is not purported as fact
Sponsor's Message
|
What do you think of SCO's new business model?
You know, it's the one where you claim that Linux vendors and users are
infringing your copyright because you own Unix and there are bits of
Unix code in the various open-source distributions.
Given the cost of litigation, this is an incredibly smart move by SCO who,
until they came up with this bright idea, looked to be headed for oblivion.
I mean -- as far as the commercial press and a raft of PC-based users
are concerned, Unix is a dinosaur and Linux is the future -- so who needs SCO
and their wares right?
The Aardvark PC-Based Digital
Entertainment Centre Project
Yes, at last, this feature
has been updated again! (31 Mar 2003)
Fortunately for SCO, the world is now a litigious place and when faced with
the prospect of being sued, many companies (both large and small) prefer
to simply roll over and concede defeat, thus saving themselves a fortune
in legal fees.
I strongly suspect that it was with this in mind that SCO embarked on its
current course of action -- trying to scare the Linux community into buying
licenses which, in all practicality, serve no purpose but to indemnify them from
legal action.
However, across the ditch our Australian friends look set to call SCO's bluff and
have demanded proof of the alleged copyright infringements.
"Ante-up with the proof or we'll sue you for making false threats" is effectively
what the Aussies are saying.
And there's a very good chance that SCO will have to back down because, it
would appear that to date, SCO have not been able to front up to any court
with significant proof of their claims that Linux contains parts of code
that they own.
So, is this stand by SCO nothing more than a modern-day protection racket?
Or does the company have a valid case and are they simply taking advantage
of the remedies offered by the law?
I guess we won't know until SCO either put up or shut up.
Don't hold your breath though -- I can see your lips turning blue already.
Note: I hope to interview someone from SCO Australia/NZ next week and present
that interview as a streaming audio feature. The questions I pose will not
be easy ones and I won't allow any dodging of the bullets so don't miss it.
The Shame of NZQA's Website
For the second time in a few short weeks it would seem that the NZQA website
which is supposed to provide ready-access to the exam marks of thousands
of high-school students has collapsed under the load.
Good grief -- that's shocking.
If they can't organise enough resource or a robust enough system to support
a level of load they must have known would be encountered then someone needs
their backside kicked.
It's neither hard nor all that expensive these days to produce robust systems
that can cope with high peak demands -- or at the very least, fail in a
decidedly graceful manner.
Was it a lack of bandwidth? A lack of CPU resource? I don't know, but
there's simply no excuse for a system that crumbles at the first hint of
above-average traffic levels.
Perhaps their problem was that even they couldn't decipher the cryptic
array of politically correct nomenclature that now surrounds the NCEA and,
by mistake, hired an utter buffoon to produce this system?
As a parent, a sometimes employer and someone with at least a gramme of
commonsense, I can't wait until they decide that A+ through F or 0%-100%
is a far more sensible way to grade a pupil's performance than simply
picking from a long list of fluffy PC descriptions where the absolute worst
you can do is "not achieve".
If any Aardvark readers want to share an opinion on today's column or
add something, you're invited to chip in and have your say in
The Aardvark Forums or, if you prefer,
you can contact me directly.
Yes, You Can Gift Money
I've published this website for the past nine years as a service to the
local internet and IT industry and during all that time it has been 100%
free to access. It is my intention to ensure that it remains completely
free and free of charge and contains only the most sparse levels of advertising.
Aardvark is not a business, it is a free resource.
If you feel that this is a good thing -- then you are welcome to gift me some
money using the buttons provided. In gifting this money you accept that no goods,
service or other consideraiton is offered, provided or accepted in return for this gift.
Just click on the button to gift whatever you can afford.
NOTE: PayPal bills in US dollars so don't accidentally gift twice
what you were intending :-)
Contacting Aardvark
I'm always happy to hear from readers, whether they're delivering brickbats,
bouquets or news tip-offs.
If you'd like to contact me directly, please
this form. If you're happy for me to republish
your comments then please be sure and select For Publication.
Other media organisations seeking more information or republication rights
are also invited to contact me.
Add Aardvark To Your Own Website!
Got a moment? Want a little extra fresh content for your own website or
page?
Just add a
couple of lines of JavaScript
to your pages and you can get
a free summary of Aardvark's daily commentary -- automatically updated
each and every week-day.
Aardvark also makes a summary of this daily column available via XML using
the RSS format. More details can be found
here.
Contact me if you decide to use either of these feeds and
have any problems.
Linking Policy
Want to link to this site? Check out Aardvark's
Linking Policy.
|
Did you tell someone else about Aardvark today? If not then do it
now!
|
|
|