Note: This column represents the opinions
of the writer and as such, is not purported as fact
Sponsor's Message
|
As the MyDoom worm continues to flood the net, you've got to wonder if
it's possible that the growing availability and use of broadband connections
isn't making the whole virus/worm situation a lot worse than it was.
The relatively slow speed and intermittent nature of an old-fashioned dial-up
connection means that it takes longer for this type of malicious software
to propagate.
Likewise, having remote control (owning) another user's PC is not all that
useful if that machine is connected via a regular phone line and modem. Such
connections are slow, have changing IP numbers and aren't always online.
No, it's the "always online", broadband connected machines that stand
to play the largest role in the rapid spread of such malevolent bits
of code.
The Aardvark PC-Based Digital
Entertainment Centre Project
Yes, at last, this feature
has been updated again! (31 Mar 2003)
Does this mean that things are going to get worse as a growing number of
people switch from dial-up to broadband?
Yes, chances are it does -- but all is not lost.
Here's an idea for broadband providers -- why not outlaw the use of cheap
DSL modems and demand instead that users only use units that have inbuilt
firewalling and NAT.
This won't stop email-based worms/viruses from spreading but, by blocking
external probes on the ports that many of these trojans and worms listen
to, the ability for such code to "own" a PC is significantly reduced.
Likewise, would it not be a good idea to control the use of port 25 (SMTP)
on broadband (or indeed all) Net connections such that attempts to make
connections outside the providers network are blocked?
This would surely ankle-tap many of the worms/viruses that have their own
built-in mailservers and, when a user had legitimate call to actually
use remote SMTP servers directly, the provider could allow such exceptions
on a user-by-user basis.
This move would also make it much harder for spammers to use "owned" machines
as spam relays -- further helping to make the Net a nicer place for everyone.
Yesterday I suggested that we need two Internets -- but perhaps we don't really.
Perhaps we simply need "Internet Lite" for the dullards, with all ports other
than HTTP, SMTP and POP3 blocked. SMTP would also (as mentioned above) be limited
to the providers own Network.
Machines running on such a "lite" version of the Net would pose a reduced
risk to other Net users.
Anyone wanting a "full" Net connection would have to demonstrate that they're
worthy of such unbridled power -- thus keeping the dullards where they belong.
Anderton Says "Don't Email Me Again"
I have written a total of a massive three or four emails to Jim Anderton in the past
12 months, all in respect to my problems with the IRD, the overseas investment deal, etc.
In the last email I wrote just yesterday, I asked Jim to explain how the
IRD was allowed to break the tax laws in order to take the action they did and
whether he was prepared to stand behind his claim that he'd
"subsidise the devil incarnate" if it meant overseas investment.
Like a true politician, Jim didn't even try to answer the "hard" questions,
but instead told me to talk to the Official Assignee -- adding:
"There is therefore little to be gained by your writing
to me further with respect to this matter."
Note that I included a copy of one of the many emails I've received from
overseas companies wanting to recruit my services in the areas of pulsejet
engine design and UAV/RPV development so he could see the importance
of addressing my questions.
It would appear that Jim isn't really interested in fostering new business
opportunities or the genesis of new hi-tech industries in NZ after all.
I hope everyone will remember this come election time, when Jim will doubtless
be crowing about his prowess as the Minister for Economic Development and
how he's worthy of re-election. Sorry Jim, I don't think so.
If any Aardvark readers want to share an opinion on today's column or
add something, you're invited to chip in and have your say in
The Aardvark Forums or, if you prefer,
you can contact me directly.
Yes, You Can Gift Money
I've published this website for the past nine years as a service to the
local internet and IT industry and during all that time it has been 100%
free to access. It is my intention to ensure that it remains completely
free and free of charge and contains only the most sparse levels of advertising.
Aardvark is not a business, it is a free resource.
If you feel that this is a good thing -- then you are welcome to gift me some
money using the buttons provided. In gifting this money you accept that no goods,
service or other consideraiton is offered, provided or accepted in return for this gift.
Just click on the button to gift whatever you can afford.
NOTE: PayPal bills in US dollars so don't accidentally gift twice
what you were intending :-)
Contacting Aardvark
I'm always happy to hear from readers, whether they're delivering brickbats,
bouquets or news tip-offs.
If you'd like to contact me directly, please
this form. If you're happy for me to republish
your comments then please be sure and select For Publication.
Other media organisations seeking more information or republication rights
are also invited to contact me.
Add Aardvark To Your Own Website!
Got a moment? Want a little extra fresh content for your own website or
page?
Just add a
couple of lines of JavaScript
to your pages and you can get
a free summary of Aardvark's daily commentary -- automatically updated
each and every week-day.
Aardvark also makes a summary of this daily column available via XML using
the RSS format. More details can be found
here.
Contact me if you decide to use either of these feeds and
have any problems.
Linking Policy
Want to link to this site? Check out Aardvark's
Linking Policy.
|
Did you tell someone else about Aardvark today? If not then do it
now!
|
|
|