Note: This column represents the opinions
of the writer and as such, is not purported as fact
Sponsor's Message
|
As I'm sure everyone knows by now, large chunks of the source code for
Microsoft's Windows 2000 product have escaped from confinement and hit
the Net.
Almost instantly, the media has started warning everyone that this will
surely mean new attacks from hackers who, now they have access to the
code's inner workings, will come up with new ways to break into our
computers.
Of course it's pretty hard to believe anything the media says these days
but do they have it right this time?
Actually, I don't think so.
The Aardvark PC-Based Digital
Entertainment Centre Project
Yes, at last, this feature
has been updated again! (31 Mar 2003)
Perhaps it's easy for me to say, because I tend not to run Windows 2K or XP on any Net-connected
PCs -- but I don't think it's really worth raising too much alarm about what this
leak means to the average fool in the street.
The reality is that evil hackers, worm and virus writers don't actually need access
to Windows source code to wreak havoc on the Net. One only has to look at
the rapid proliferation of the recent MyDoom virus and variants to realise this.
Readers Say
|
Got something to say about today's column, or want to see what
others think?
Visit The Forums
|
|
Besides which, if Microsoft has done a half decent job of writing the code
concerned, simply knowing *how* it works should not mean it becomes a trivial
job to crack.
Just knowing how the tumbler mechanism in a safe works doesn't mean that
you can become a safe-cracker does it?
And anyone can get ahold of the entire source code for Linux -- but this hasn't
given rise to a raft of worms and viruses attacking that platform has it?
No, this code leak poses a greater threat to Microsoft than it does
to the users of its code.
I expect that right now there are armies of Open Source programmers pawing
over the code and looking for valuable hints as to how they can improve
their own work -- or even provide a greater level of interoperability with
Windows.
Quite frankly, that's got to be a good thing for all concerned -- although
I doubt you'll get Microsoft to admit it.
What I'd like to see is an objective review of Microsoft's source by someone
who is sufficiently skilled and experienced to actually tender a worthwhile
opinion. That may well allow the rest of us to set our own expectations
in respect to the number and magnitude of potential future vulnerabilities.
StopSpam.net.nz
According to this story
from IDG, a new website, StopSpam.net.nz
has been set up to help in the fight against spam.
Unfortunately, when I checked just a few minutes ago, the domain name
appears to do little but point to the ISOCNZ/InternetNZ
website.
I find it interesting to read in the IDG story however, how Keith Norris,
as head of the DMA, has done a big U-turn in respect to his stand on the
need for legislation to control spam.
Unless my Alzheimer's is playing up, just a few short years ago, Norris was
busy arguing that there was no need for such legislation. Perhaps he's
changed his mind because his own members' mailings are being lost in the rising
tide of spam?
To the NZ DMA's credit however, I have to admit that I've never been spammed by
one of their members so their own self-regulation appears to be working quite
well. I still find it rather ironic that they're clearly suffering from
spam to the same extent as the rest of us.
New Forums!
Yes folks, good news. The grotty ezboard forums have been replaced with
a new phpBBS-based system that won't assault you with a myriad of pop-ups and
other flotsam.
A big thanks to Managed Internet Solutions
for offering to provide this service.
You can access the new forums over at
aardvarkforums.co.nz
Yes, You Can Gift Money
I've published this website for the past nine years as a service to the
local internet and IT industry and during all that time it has been 100%
free to access. It is my intention to ensure that it remains completely
free and free of charge and contains only the most sparse levels of advertising.
Aardvark is not a business, it is a free resource.
If you feel that this is a good thing and/or you hold a "geniune affection"
for yours truly -- then you are welcome to gift me some
money using the buttons provided. In gifting this money you accept that no goods,
service or other consideration is offered, provided, accepted or anticipated in return.
Just click on the button to gift whatever you can afford.
NOTE: PayPal bills in US dollars so don't accidentally gift more than
what you were intending :-)
Contacting Aardvark
I'm always happy to hear from readers, whether they're delivering brickbats,
bouquets or news tip-offs.
If you'd like to contact me directly, please
this form. If you're happy for me to republish
your comments then please be sure and select For Publication.
Other media organisations seeking more information or republication rights
are also invited to contact me.
Add Aardvark To Your Own Website!
Got a moment? Want a little extra fresh content for your own website or
page?
Just add a
couple of lines of JavaScript
to your pages and you can get
a free summary of Aardvark's daily commentary -- automatically updated
each and every week-day.
Aardvark also makes a summary of this daily column available via XML using
the RSS format. More details can be found
here.
Contact me if you decide to use either of these feeds and
have any problems.
Linking Policy
Want to link to this site? Check out Aardvark's
Linking Policy.
|
Did you tell someone else about Aardvark today? If not then do it
now!
|
|
|