Note: This column represents the opinions
of the writer and as such, is not purported as fact
Sponsor's Message
|
Every morning I read the newspaper and hope to find some accurate, professional
news reporting.
Every evening I watch TV in the same vain hope.
More often than not however, the result is a poorly compiled digest of pseudo-facts
and misinformation.
What on earth is going on with our news media these days and has the arrival
of the Net made things better or worse?
TV news has turned into a tabloid-styled collection of fast-food-sized newsbytes
that are packaged so as to emphasize the sizzle and almost completely ignore
the meat of the story.
"Human interest" stories and stunning revelations that Rachel Hunter has posed
nude for Playboy seem to be standard fare on the all-important 6 o'clock
bulletin.
The Aardvark PC-Based Digital
Entertainment Centre Project
Yes, at last, this feature
has been updated again! (31 Mar 2003)
"In depth" reporting consists of a few current affairs programmes that tend
to allocate about 15 minutes to each very-important story and again have
an inordinately strong focus on titillation rather than information.
Hell, I just hate seeing the all-pervasive reality TV/voyeurism approach invading
the newsroom.
I'm actually so pleased that Prime TV have launched their 5:30pm bulletin. It
manages to fit all the important news into just 30 minutes (rather than an hour)
and Suzy Aitken does a very credible job of producing and presenting the bulletin.
However, every time I hear her say "First at 5:30" I feel like throwing
the cat at the TV. Forget it Suzy, we all know when your bulletin screens
and if that irritating attempt at brainwashing continues, I will give up
on Prime's news as well.
Readers Say
|
Got something to say about today's column, or want to see what
others think?
Visit The Forums
|
|
Even the country's largest newspaper tends to leave out more than it includes
when it comes to news reporting and, as suggested by a goodly number of people
I know, exhibits more than a little bias in some areas.
Why have the mediums of print and broadcast found it necessary to sink to
such a low level?
Hell, even that bastion of credibility and professionalism in news reporting -
the BBC - has fallen from its high standards recently, with an almighty thump.
Is it that the IQ of the public has been terminally dulled by a million
different home-renovation and Survivor-type programmes. Have we lost
the ability to understand big words and concentrate on one thing for more
than 30 seconds at a time?
Or could it be that the Net is offering some real competition to print
and broadcast news providers?
By logging onto the Net, I can get the very latest news any time of the day
or night -- and what's more, I can get it from a news source that is right
there in the country where all the action's happening.
Bearing this in mind, have the traditional methods of delivering news become
far less important? Perhaps this is why we now have info-tainment rather than
news on our screens.
Well I'm afraid that the standards of reporting on the Net aren't much better.
I have a *huge* list of links and screen-shots here that show an unbelievably
lax attitude to facts, detail, and even proof-reading. Fortunately, I
consider this column to an informal commentary rather than "news reporting" so, despite
my own shortcomings, I choose to dodge that bullet :-)
I'm not sure why we're now being treated like a nation of knuckle-draggers
but I'm not impressed.
Spam Laws on the Way
Radio NZ reports this morning that the government is now preparing to move
on the issue of anti-spam legislation -- good news.
Not so good is the fact that they seem to think it important to focus on
legislating against local spammers before addressing the issue of some kind
of international cooperation. What percentage of the spam in your mailbox
could possibly be defined as "local"??
Even more worrying was the DMA's definition of spam as: email you didn't
request and which is on a topic which is of no interest to you and from
someone with who you have no existing relationship.
What a cunning definition -- but did you notice all those logical AND
operators?
It seems that the DMA consider it okay to send you email if any of the
defining parameters are FALSE.
So, if you once bought a particular product from a DMA member, does that
mean they can spam you forever and a day with more offers for that product
because: a) There's an existing relationship and b) you clearly have
an interest in that product.
Sorry DMA, MY definition of spam is: *ANY* email you didn't request that
touts a product or service.
Forget about using "existing relationships" or "an interest" as a get out of
jail free card. If I didn't expressly ask for your pitches by email,
you have no right to send them to me and they are definitely spam.
Let's hope our politicians are listening to the people rather than the
peddlers on this one.
New Forums!
Yes folks, good news. The grotty ezboard forums have been replaced with
a new phpBBS-based system that won't assault you with a myriad of pop-ups and
other flotsam.
A big thanks to Managed Internet Solutions
for offering to provide this service.
You can access the new forums over at
aardvarkforums.co.nz
Yes, You Can Gift Money
I've published this website for the past nine years as a service to the
local internet and IT industry and during all that time it has been 100%
free to access. It is my intention to ensure that it remains completely
free and free of charge and contains only the most sparse levels of advertising.
Aardvark is not a business, it is a free resource.
If you feel that this is a good thing and/or you hold a "geniune affection"
for yours truly -- then you are welcome to gift me some
money using the buttons provided. In gifting this money you accept that no goods,
service or other consideration is offered, provided, accepted or anticipated in return.
Just click on the button to gift whatever you can afford.
NOTE: PayPal bills in US dollars so don't accidentally gift more than
what you were intending :-)
Contacting Aardvark
I'm always happy to hear from readers, whether they're delivering brickbats,
bouquets or news tip-offs.
If you'd like to contact me directly, please
this form. If you're happy for me to republish
your comments then please be sure and select For Publication.
Other media organisations seeking more information or republication rights
are also invited to contact me.
Add Aardvark To Your Own Website!
Got a moment? Want a little extra fresh content for your own website or
page?
Just add a
couple of lines of JavaScript
to your pages and you can get
a free summary of Aardvark's daily commentary -- automatically updated
each and every week-day.
Aardvark also makes a summary of this daily column available via XML using
the RSS format. More details can be found
here.
Contact me if you decide to use either of these feeds and
have any problems.
Linking Policy
Want to link to this site? Check out Aardvark's
Linking Policy.
|
Did you tell someone else about Aardvark today? If not then do it
now!
|
|
|