Note: This column represents the opinions
of the writer and as such, is not purported as fact
Sponsor's Message
|
After all the grief the IRD has given me over the past several years, I have to declare that
I write today's column with little sympathy or compassion for an organ of
the government that has more powers than the police and is seldom afraid
to use them against any powerless taxpayer they might take a personal dislike to.
Yesterday I received a pile of messages from very annoyed readers who had
found themselves on the receiving end of a stream of email being
spewed by the IRD's computer systems.
The department has admitted
that cause of the problem was an infection with the
Sobig.B virus, and one
hapless Aardvark reader reports that he received dozens copies of
virus-laden messages from the infected email system.
The Aardvark PC-Based Digital
Entertainment Centre Project
Yes, at last, this feature
has been updated again! (31 Mar 2003)
Given that the IRD has the right (nay, the obligation) to pry deeply into
the financial affairs of taxpayers, surely we should be outraged that they
would allow any of their computers to be operated in a manner that results in
an infection by virus or trojan programs.
The news that they were hit by a virus comes as no surprise to me however, since
during my numerous email exchanges with them, the IRD has insisted on sending me
documents in MS Word format rather than as plaintext, and it would appear that
their staff have not been made aware that proprietary MS formats are neither
secure nor safe.
Surely there are few government departments who have a higher obligation to
protect the information of those they deal with than the IRD and yesterday's
fiasco makes a sorry joke of any assurances that have been, or will be, forthcoming
in respect to client confidentiality.
Although we are assured that no taxpayer information was leaked as a result of yesterday's
infection, how can we now be sure that there aren't other machines in the
department's inventory which might perhaps infested with key-logging trojans or
other malicious software? And how can we rest easy that the next infection won't
compromise the security of taxpayer details?
When you or I file a tax return, we are required (under threat of severe
financial penalty) to be meticulously careful and accurate. Surely this burden of
responsibility is a two-way street and someone's backside should get a
severe pasting over any security lapse on the part of the IRD.
And who would bear the cost of fixing damage caused when the IRD's computers
start spewing virus-laden emails at unsuspecting taxpayers?
Lord knows the cost of complying with our tax laws are heavy enough without
adding the expense of having your PC disinfected due to lax standards at
the IRD.
As a taxpayer who was told several years ago by an IRD employee that "we'll get you" and has
been subjected to a huge amount of crap and expense ever since,
I think it's time the tables were turned and the taxman was held to account over
this lapse.
(For those interested, the full story of my grief with the IRD,
including the name of the employee who made the threat, will be documented in
a book that should hit the shelves sometime next year.)
But this is just my opinion and, as I've openly declared, I find it
difficult to be objective in this matter -- so I'll try and restore some
balance to today's column by asking readers to voice their own opinions.
Should we expect the IRD to do better? Are their procedures and Net-operating
practices adequate?
Is it fair that they demand higher standards of perfection from taxpayers than
they are prepared to deliver in return?
Are you still happy to entrust the department with your private and/or commercially
sensitive financial details in light of yesterday's events?
All feedback welcomed, anonymity preserved if requested. Don't forget to
select "For Publication" if you want to share those comments with Aardvark's
readers.
If any Aardvark readers have an opinion on today's column or
want to add something you're also invited to chip in and
have your say.
Yes, You Can Donate
Although the very kind folks at iHug continue to generously sponsor the
publication of Aardvark, the bills still exceed the income by a fairly
significant amount. It is with this in mind therefore that I'm once
again soliciting donations from anyone who feels they're getting some
value from this daily column and news index. I've gone the PayPal
way of accepting donations because the time involved in processing a bunch
of little credit-card billings sometimes exceeds the monetary value they
represent. Just click on the button to donate whatever you can afford.
NOTE: PayPal bills in US dollars so don't accidentally donate twice
what you were intending :-)
Contacting Aardvark
As always, readers are invited to submit their comments on material covered
in this column. If you'd like your comments published here then please
be sure to use this form and select For Publication.
Other media organisations seeking more information or republication rights
are also invited to contact me.
Add Aardvark To Your Own Website!
Got a moment? Want a little extra fresh content for your own website or
page?
Just add a
couple of lines of JavaScript
to your pages and you can get
a free summary of Aardvark's daily commentary -- automatically updated
each and every week-day.
Aardvark also makes a summary of this daily column available via XML using
the RSS format. More details can be found
here.
Contact me if you decide to use either of these feeds and
have any problems.
Linking Policy
Want to link to this site? Check out Aardvark's
Linking Policy.
|
Did you tell someone else about Aardvark today? If not then do it
now!
|
|
|