Note: This column represents the opinions
of the writer and as such, is not purported as fact
Sponsor's Message
|
Did anyone watch TVNZ's "Test The Nation" fiasco on TV1 last night?
Is it just me, or has the quality of TV1's programming fallen through
the floor since the politicians demanded more emphasis on the
directives contained in the broadcaster's charter?
Why on earth did they waste hours of valuable TV broadcasting time on this
ridiculous and blatant grab for ratings?
And what did we learn from this enlightening piece of trash?
Yes folks, the average IQ is around 100 and the stereotypes regarding
the intelligence of blondes and Asians were unreasonably reinforced.
The Aardvark PC-Based Digital
Entertainment Centre Project
Yes, at last, this feature
has been updated again! (31 Mar 2003)
And while blondes were portrayed in a rather poor light, the group
with the lowest IQ on the night were those responsible for the programme's
website at testthenation.nzoom.com.
Now come on folks, if you're going to copy programme that has achieved
huge audience ratings in other countries, and if you're going to heavily
promote an interactive online element, then commonsense (and even the tiniest
of IQs) would dictate that you make sure you've got enough bandwidth and
server capacity to cope.
As anyone who tried to log onto the supporting website will have found,
the blondes looked positively Einsteinian compared to those who did the
capacity planning for the online component.
But technical botch-ups aside, this program has done little but split the
nation into three camps:
- those who now have an inferiority complex because they scored less than 100.
- those who now think they're better than the rest of us because they scored
more than 100.
- the small number who scored close to 100 and think they're normal, but
remain disappointed that they're not "brainy".
The reality is, that the only thing an IQ test measures, is the participant's
ability to perform well in an IQ test -- but almost half of those taking part
will now think they're intellectually deficient.
In my opinion, this program was bad television, and if this is what The Charter
considers to be "worthy public broadcasting" then I hold little hope for TV1's future
as a channel worth watching.
One thing worthy of note in last night's programme -- did you notice that
people in the studio were grouped by a number of factors, including gender,
hair colour and occupation. But where were the politicians?
I think we all know the answer to that one don't we?
Bugger Off Hi-Tech, Come Back Hollywood
And, as if to prove the point, the government has decided to provide the
movie industry with a "cash-back" incentive, worth up to 12.5% of the money
they spend here.
This is a clear and sensible acknowledgement that, when you're trying to
foster overseas investment and expenditure in NZ, it pays to give a little
in order to make a lot.
So what's my beef?
Well why only the film industry? Why not hi-tech industries at the core
of the world's knowledge economy?
Perhaps a clue can be found in the propensity the PM shows to throw large
amounts of taxpayer's money (often unhudgeted) at the Arts community, (refs:
Arts policy strikes a welcome chord (18/11/1999),
Clark delivers more than she pledges in arts (19/05/2000),
$14 million budget boost for arts (14/05/2003))
seemingly as a result of a strong personal interest in this area
Certainly those in the arts (including the film industry)
are the darling children of Helen Clark -- which, in light of yesterday's
announcement, leaves you wondering about the fiscal objectivity of the government
she commands, doesn't it?
Why can't we offer this 12.5% "cash-back on expenses" to *any* industry that wants to
come to NZ and spend tens or hundreds of millions of dollars here?
By offering this deal to the movie industry, the government has proven that
it accepts the validity of the concept as a bonafide method of boosting
the nation's coffers -- so what's the problem with extending it to all industries?
If we'd offered this deal to the likes of Microsoft, Motorola and Intel,
maybe they'd have gone ahead with their plans to invest huge sums
of money here. Instead, after being told that the current government
didn't entertain such concessions, they took their money and spent it
elsewhere -- at the cost of very important knowledge-economy jobs and
spin-off benefits.
I bet Billy boy and his peers will be even less likely to consider NZ a
stable, sensible place to invest their money now that the PM appears to
be playing favourites with fiscal policy, the government handing out
concessions that are seemingly based on her own personal penchants.
Jim Anderton is this morning quoted as saying
that the screen industry was getting special treatment because
"There is significant evidence to suggest that if incentives aren't given
then these films go elsewhere."
Sorry Jim, but recent experience has PROVEN that the same is true of industries
at the core of the hi-tech knowledge economy so again I ask -- why treat
movies differently?
Jim Anderton Responds
Full marks to the Minister for Economic Development, Jim Anderton. It seems that
Jim is really on the ball these days has responded to
today's column in person. Whether you agree with his politics or not,
it must be acknowledged that Jim is one of the very few politicians who
has occasionally taken the time to actually respond to this column when
appropriate. You can read his comments here.
|
I'm sure most readers will have an opinion on this so share your thoughts
in the forums!
If any Aardvark readers want to share opinion on today's column or
add something, you're invited to chip in and have your say in
The Aardvark Forums or, if you prefer,
you can contact me directly.
Yes, You Can Donate
Although the very kind folks at iHug continue to generously sponsor the
publication of Aardvark, the bills still exceed the income by a fairly
significant amount. It is with this in mind therefore that I'm once
again soliciting donations from anyone who feels they're getting some
value from this daily column and news index. I've gone the PayPal
way of accepting donations because the time involved in processing a bunch
of little credit-card billings sometimes exceeds the monetary value they
represent. Just click on the button to donate whatever you can afford.
NOTE: PayPal bills in US dollars so don't accidentally donate twice
what you were intending :-)
Contacting Aardvark
As always, readers are invited to submit their comments on material covered
in this column. If you'd like your comments published here then please
be sure to use this form and select For Publication.
Other media organisations seeking more information or republication rights
are also invited to contact me.
Add Aardvark To Your Own Website!
Got a moment? Want a little extra fresh content for your own website or
page?
Just add a
couple of lines of JavaScript
to your pages and you can get
a free summary of Aardvark's daily commentary -- automatically updated
each and every week-day.
Aardvark also makes a summary of this daily column available via XML using
the RSS format. More details can be found
here.
Contact me if you decide to use either of these feeds and
have any problems.
Linking Policy
Want to link to this site? Check out Aardvark's
Linking Policy.
|
Did you tell someone else about Aardvark today? If not then do it
now!
|
|
|