Note: This column represents the opinions
of the writer and as such, is not purported as fact
Sponsor's Message
|
I have to admit to being one of the many millions of people all around the world
who doesn't run Windows XP as their primary operating system and who manages
to scrape by using an aged PC with an old 400MHz Pentium II processor.
However, for the type of work I do (writing, web-surfing, etc), this sloth-like
antique system does just fine (which is just as well because I won't be able
to afford to replace it for quite some time).
There's no way, despite its 256MB of RAM, that this machine would run efficiently
with Windows XP, which is why it is currently loaded with Windows 98 (gasp!).
Of course there are some up-sides to not running XP and one of those are that
I never had any problems with the Blaster worm or the myriad of other XP-specific
bits of malware that have rampaged across the Net in recent times.
Like myself, there are a surprisingly large number of people who simply don't
see the need to spend a goodly fistful of money buying newer, faster hardware
just so they can upgrade(?) to Windows XP. They're perfectly happy working
within the limits that earlier Windows versions impose.
Well it seems that Microsoft may now have spotted a cunning opportunity to rake
in a little more revenue -- by forcing those Win98 and other users to upgrade to
XP, whether they want to or not.
Just how are they going to do this?
Simple -- just stop issuing security updates for versions of IE that run on those
earlier versions of windows.
Now have your say
|
Got something to say about today's column, or want to see what
others think?
Visit The Forums
While you're here, why not visit the Aardvark
Hall of Shame
and perhaps make your own nomination.
|
|
If I were an Internet Explorer user (which I'm not), this would concern me
on two levels.
Firstly, I would not be at all happy that Microsoft was prepared to say "tough
luck, upgrade or risk getting hammered by all manner of malware".
Secondly, I realise that every compromised PC on the Net costs all Net users
money and time. Microsoft seems prepared to ignore the fact that by not
offering security fixes for its browser to the many millions of older systems
on the Net it will be creating a wonderful breeding ground for malware.
Of course the brighter folk running non-XP versions of Windows will simply
upgrade their browser to FireFox or Opera and save themselves a mountain
of grief -- but let's face it, the IQ of your average Net user has been falling
steadily for many years. I'm betting that only a small percentage of
those affected will cast their IE aside for a superior product.
Avoiding the churn fee?
As we all know, Telecom has opted to fine those ISPs who attempt to take
advantage of the competition its UBS service will bring to the market (eventually).
If you swap from one ISP to another, your new ISP will have to pay a rather stiff
"churn fee" to Telecom as punishment for its sins. That the government
allows this blatantly anti-competitive fee to exist beggars belief -- but then
again we all know that there's a lot more going on in the Telecom-Government
relationship than either party will admit to.
But what happens if you get *another* DSL account with a different ISP without
relinquishing the first one?
Yes, you can have two separate DSL accounts with two separate ISPs (I've done it)
and why should the new ISP have to pay a "churn fee" when the customer still
uses the service provided by the first ISP?
Perhaps, by using this tactic, ISPs can defeat the churn fee. Keep your old
DSL account for a month after you sign up to the new one and then drop it.
No doubt Telecom will claim that this still constitutes churn -- but I suspect
that their dictionary will be a special "telco" edition.
Lighten Up
Almost out of space/time for this week's lighten up so here are some quickies:
It would appear that Microsoft are now making
teeshirts.
Hands up all those who want to press ctrl-alt-del on this one? :-)
And here's proof that even the homeless are now computer-literate.
Yes, You Can Gift Money
I've published this website for the past nine years as a service to the
local internet and IT industry and during all that time it has been 100%
free to access. It is my intention to ensure that it remains completely
free and free of charge and contains only the most sparse levels of advertising.
Aardvark is not a business, it is a free resource.
If you feel that this is a good thing and/or you hold a "geniune affection"
for yours truly -- then you are welcome to gift me some
money using the buttons provided. In gifting this money you accept that no goods,
service or other consideration is offered, provided, accepted or anticipated in return.
Just click on the button to gift whatever you can afford.
NOTE: PayPal bills in US dollars so don't accidentally gift more than
what you were intending :-)
Contacting Aardvark
I'm always happy to hear from readers, whether they're delivering brickbats,
bouquets or news tip-offs.
If you'd like to contact me directly, please
this form. If you're happy for me to republish
your comments then please be sure and select For Publication.
Other media organisations seeking more information or republication rights
are also invited to contact me.
Add Aardvark To Your Own Website!
Got a moment? Want a little extra fresh content for your own website or
page?
Just add a
couple of lines of JavaScript
to your pages and you can get
a free summary of Aardvark's daily commentary -- automatically updated
each and every week-day.
Aardvark also makes a summary of this daily column available via XML using
the RSS format. More details can be found
here.
Contact me if you decide to use either of these feeds and
have any problems.
Linking Policy
Want to link to this site? Check out Aardvark's
Linking Policy.
|
Did you tell someone else about Aardvark today? If not then do it
now!
|
|