Note: This column represents the opinions
of the writer and as such, is not purported as fact
Sponsor's Message
|
If Wired.com is right in this story,
newspapers are scratching to attract younger readers as online news
sources draw them away from the medium that is dead trees and ink.
I for one don't find this at all surprising and believe that the traditional
print-media press should already be planning long and hard for what could
be a major redesign of their business model.
As soon as some practical form of electronic display technology that can
rival paper for clarity and convenience arrives on the scene, the newspaper,
as we know it, will be dead in the water.
Sure, there will always be some sales of the bio-degradable version but the
vast majority of people will opt for electronic delivery and display.
Most importantly, those who choose the electronic version are far more likely
to be the affluent segment of society who have more money available for
purchasing the products advertisers are pitching.
Now have your say
|
Got something to say about today's column, or want to see what
others think?
Visit The Forums
While you're here, why not visit the Aardvark
Hall of Shame
and perhaps make your own nomination.
|
|
Now the real problem facing newspapers is not that of producing an electronic
edition -- most are doing this now through their websites. No, the real
problem is leveraging that electronic edition in a way that can generate
the same amount of advertising revenues as are currently earned from the
print version.
As we all know, banner ads are a pretty ineffective way of reaching your
audience and the current generation of highly animated Flash advertisements
are just downright annoying. How are publishers going to get around
this consumer-resistance to the ads they carry?
Right now a newspaper can charge an awful lot more for a quarter-page ad
in its printed edition than it could for a quarter screen
of display advertising on its website -- why is that?
Even more worrying for newspapers is that advertisers are wising up to the
flexibility that an electronic medium can offer.
Why pay for the worthless "impressions" that occur when a banner ad for
feminine hygiene products appears on the screen of a computer being
used by a 60-year-old man? Advertisers want to pay for results, not
worthless impressions.
This makes the job of generating ad revenues even more difficult for the poor
old publisher -- because, as we all know, some products and ads are just downright
boring and useless.
Will the subscription model work perhaps?
Hundreds of thousands of people are happy to pay a subscription to get Sky TV
or their current daily newspapers, so why not pay for an electronic version?
Well the problem with this idea is that there will always be someone, somewhere
who's prepared to offer news content for free, or by way of a solely ad-funded
model. And, when the content is being delivered electronically, it doesn't
really matter how big that other publisher is or where they're based -- you can
still get your daily news-fix just as easily.
As I said at the beginning of today's column -- we're entering "interesting times"
for newspapers. Hopefully they will respond with innovative ideas and clever
new models. Unfortunately I'm resigned to the probability that they won't.
What do you think? If a really good reader was available (perhaps a foldable
"electronic paper"), would you forsake your daily bundle of newsprint for
an electronic version? Have you already dumped buying a newspaper for reading
the same stuff online?
Would you pay a subscription to get your news delivered electronically?
And, what effect would the collapse of newsprint-based news delivery have on
our forestry industry I wonder.
Have your say on today's column
Yes, You Can Gift Money
I've published this website for the past nine years as a service to the
local internet and IT industry and during all that time it has been 100%
free to access. It is my intention to ensure that it remains completely
free and free of charge and contains only the most sparse levels of advertising.
Aardvark is not a business, it is a free resource.
If you feel that this is a good thing and/or you hold a "geniune affection"
for yours truly -- then you are welcome to gift me some
money using the buttons provided. In gifting this money you accept that no goods,
service or other consideration is offered, provided, accepted or anticipated in return.
Just click on the button to gift whatever you can afford.
NOTE: PayPal bills in US dollars so don't accidentally gift more than
what you were intending :-)
Contacting Aardvark
I'm always happy to hear from readers, whether they're delivering brickbats,
bouquets or news tip-offs.
If you'd like to contact me directly, please
this form. If you're happy for me to republish
your comments then please be sure and select For Publication.
Other media organisations seeking more information or republication rights
are also invited to contact me.
Add Aardvark To Your Own Website!
Got a moment? Want a little extra fresh content for your own website or
page?
Just add a
couple of lines of JavaScript
to your pages and you can get
a free summary of Aardvark's daily commentary -- automatically updated
each and every week-day.
Aardvark also makes a summary of this daily column available via XML using
the RSS format. More details can be found
here.
Contact me if you decide to use either of these feeds and
have any problems.
Linking Policy
Want to link to this site? Check out Aardvark's
Linking Policy.
|
Did you tell someone else about Aardvark today? If not then do it
now!
|
|