Note: This column represents the opinions
of the writer and as such, is not purported as fact
Sponsor's Message
|
Let's face it, we're now living in a world that is incredibly reliant on
hi-technology.
When I was a kid, anyone could fix virtually any problem with any car engine,
so long as you had a suitable socket-set and a large enough hammer. That's far
from the case today however. Unless you have all the necessary diagnostic tools,
replacement computer modules and reference documents then you're limited
to things like blacking the tires and refilling the windscreen washer bottle.
Of course the up-side of this technology (especially in cars) is that there's
now much less need to dive under the bonnet because engines and other bits
are now far more reliable than they used to be.
Now have your say
|
Got something to say about today's column, or want to see what
others think?
Visit The Forums
While you're here, why not visit the Aardvark
Hall of Shame
and perhaps make your own nomination.
|
|
In fact, one of the biggest benefits that advancing technology has brought us
is a significant increase in the reliability of many every-day items.
When I was at school, one career option was that of an electronics tech -- someone
who would come around and fix your TV or to who you could take your transistor
radio, cassette player or car stereo.
These days, advances in the reliability of such devices, combined with a significantly
lower purchase cost, has meant that there just isn't the same amount of work
around for electronics techs.
In recent years, various NZ governments have touted the options of introducing
new technology to other aspects of our lives. Things such as smart ID cards,
automatic vehicle tolling, speed cameras and a raft of other hi-tech devices
have either been proposed or actually rolled out.
Much of this makes good sense of course -- why pay a fist-full of cops to sit
on the highway and catch speeding motorists when a mobile or permanent speed
camera can do the job just as well while those cops get on with other duties?
It is indeed a great shame however, that our peacenik politicians haven't
seen fit to extend this penchant for hi-tech to the ranks of our Air Force.
Once again we've been badly embarrassed by the failure of one of our Hercules
transport aircraft after it suffered engine problems while providing tsunami
relief to affected countries.
A quick search of the NZ Herald's archives provide a raft of reports
that are a sad testament to the reliability of our Air Force's key
aircraft.
Almost every time we call on the AF to use these craft one or more of them
ends up breaking down or being unavailable because of mechanical problems.
To be fair, given the way the government has gutted the Air Force in favour
of the Army, the fact that they have any airworthy planes is a glowing endorsement
of the resourcefulness and skill of their maintenance engineers.
Give that the government prides itself on providing peace-keeping and
humanitarian aid to other countries by way of the military, isn't it about
time that we spent a little of that *huge* surplus on bringing our Air Force
into the 21st century?
Surely, if the government has decided that we don't need even a token
defensive capability, we ought to be ensuring that our transport planes
aren't 30-year-old relics suffering from old-age and rapidly diminishing
reliability?
Helen is always quick to take a photo-op with our armed services, how about
she actually make sure they're not turned into a laughing stock by a
mean, penny-pinching, peacenik attitude.
Even one relatively new transport plane that offered a much greater level
of availability and reliability would be a wonderful step forwards -- or
is she planning to totally dismantle our Air Force in favour of land-based
troops with hang-gliders?
Could Helen Clarke be our Hercules' Delilah? (Okay, so it was Samson and
Delilah -- but you get the idea right?).
Aardvark Forums
The forums are back up at:
www.aardvarkforums.co.nz/forums,
have your say on today's column
Unfortunately you'll have to re-register because we're starting the new year
with a complete reinstall.
Yes, You Can Gift Money
I've published this website for the past nine years as a service to the
local internet and IT industry and during all that time it has been 100%
free to access. It is my intention to ensure that it remains completely
free and free of charge and contains only the most sparse levels of advertising.
Aardvark is not a business, it is a free resource.
If you feel that this is a good thing and/or you hold a "geniune affection"
for yours truly -- then you are welcome to gift me some
money using the buttons provided. In gifting this money you accept that no goods,
service or other consideration is offered, provided, accepted or anticipated in return.
Just click on the button to gift whatever you can afford.
NOTE: PayPal bills in US dollars so don't accidentally gift more than
what you were intending :-)
Contacting Aardvark
I'm always happy to hear from readers, whether they're delivering brickbats,
bouquets or news tip-offs.
If you'd like to contact me directly, please
this form. If you're happy for me to republish
your comments then please be sure and select For Publication.
Other media organisations seeking more information or republication rights
are also invited to contact me.
Add Aardvark To Your Own Website!
Got a moment? Want a little extra fresh content for your own website or
page?
Just add a
couple of lines of JavaScript
to your pages and you can get
a free summary of Aardvark's daily commentary -- automatically updated
each and every week-day.
Aardvark also makes a summary of this daily column available via XML using
the RSS format. More details can be found
here.
Contact me if you decide to use either of these feeds and
have any problems.
Linking Policy
Want to link to this site? Check out Aardvark's
Linking Policy.
|
Did you tell someone else about Aardvark today? If not then do it
now!
|
|