Note: This column represents the opinions
of the writer and as such, is not purported as fact
Sponsor's Message
|
Modern cars have a raft of onboard electronics, most of which are designed to
make the engines more efficient and improve the simplicity and ease of operation.
Some of these gizmos however, are designed to make cars harder to steal.
Keyless entry and sophisticated burglar alarms are becoming increasingly commonplace
within the modern vehicle fleet and the honk of alarms arming and disarming
has become a regular sound in most supermarket parking areas.
Now the government has decided that far too many vehicles are being stolen and
that we're all a bit too stupid to put in our own alarms or immobilisers --
therefore they must legislate to protect us from ourselves.
At first glance, this might seem like a great idea -- after all, if all
newly imported cars were fitted with sophisticated immobiliser systems then
surely the would be harder to nick.
Now have your say
|
Got something to say about today's column, or want to see what
others think?
Visit The Forums
While you're here, why not visit the Aardvark
Hall of Shame
and perhaps make your own nomination.
|
|
Well it's hard to argue with that claim -- or is it?
Don't virtually *all* cars have steering column locks?
Yes, yes they do.
Do they stop theft?
Hell no. Dedicated car thieves can disable a steering lock in less time than
it takes you or I to use a key to do the same thing.
I strongly suspect therefore, that those who are responsible for a very fair
percentage of vehicle thefts (the same ones to whom a steering lock is just
a joke) will also know exactly how to "remobilise" any vehicle fitted with
the budget $350 units the government wants to force on us.
Surely anything that is an add-on to a vehicle, rather than an integrated
part of the engine management computer, can be compromised quite easily as
part of the "hotwiring" process?
According to the AA, the cost of fitting these devices to imported cars would
run to about $60-$110 million per year.
Hmm... how many coppers on the beat could we buy for that much money?
Even if we assume that the total cost of running a PC Plod comes to $150K
per year, that's almost another 750 policemen actively policing our roads
and car-parks.
I think what the government has forgotten here is that technology is a dual-edged
sword that can be used by those on both sides of the law.
One only has to look at the ongoing battle between virus-writers and anti-virus
companies, spammers and spam-blockers, pirates and music/movie companies, etc to
realise that no amount of sticking-plaster technology is going to have a real
impact on car theft.
If the government really wants us all to fit immobilisers or security systems
to our cars then they ought to suggest to insurance companies that they offer
a greater discount on premiums to the owners of cars fitted with such equipment.
The fact that the size of this discount is currently so small kind of indicates
to me that the insurance companies aren't convinced it makes a hell of a lot
of difference to theft rates.
Do you have an immobiliser on your car? Would you spend $350-$500 to have one
fitted? Do you think it's fair to require such devices by law? Do you really
think they would be any more effective than a cheap alarm, Club, or steering lock?
Lighten Up
Many people are claiming that NZ has become much like the US from a political
perspective and that our elections (there's one this year don't you know) have
become "presidential style" events.
Well God help us and let's hope we never see the Kiwi equivalent of
this type of thing on the Net.
Don't forget folks, when it comes to the lighten-up section, you only get
as good as you give so send in those suggestions today.
Aardvark Forums
The forums are back up at:
www.aardvarkforums.co.nz/forums,
have your say on today's column
Unfortunately you'll have to re-register because we're starting the new year
with a complete reinstall.
Yes, You Can Gift Money
I've published this website for the past nine years as a service to the
local internet and IT industry and during all that time it has been 100%
free to access. It is my intention to ensure that it remains completely
free and free of charge and contains only the most sparse levels of advertising.
Aardvark is not a business, it is a free resource.
If you feel that this is a good thing and/or you hold a "geniune affection"
for yours truly -- then you are welcome to gift me some
money using the buttons provided. In gifting this money you accept that no goods,
service or other consideration is offered, provided, accepted or anticipated in return.
Just click on the button to gift whatever you can afford.
NOTE: PayPal bills in US dollars so don't accidentally gift more than
what you were intending :-)
Contacting Aardvark
I'm always happy to hear from readers, whether they're delivering brickbats,
bouquets or news tip-offs.
If you'd like to contact me directly, please
this form. If you're happy for me to republish
your comments then please be sure and select For Publication.
Other media organisations seeking more information or republication rights
are also invited to contact me.
Add Aardvark To Your Own Website!
Got a moment? Want a little extra fresh content for your own website or
page?
Just add a
couple of lines of JavaScript
to your pages and you can get
a free summary of Aardvark's daily commentary -- automatically updated
each and every week-day.
Aardvark also makes a summary of this daily column available via XML using
the RSS format. More details can be found
here.
Contact me if you decide to use either of these feeds and
have any problems.
Linking Policy
Want to link to this site? Check out Aardvark's
Linking Policy.
|
Did you tell someone else about Aardvark today? If not then do it
now!
|
|