Note: This column represents the opinions
of the writer and as such, is not purported as fact
Sponsor's Message
|
A few years ago the internet was the media's darling child. Print and broadcast
reports carried endless stories about how this new technology was going
to change your lives for the better and how unprecedented numbers of
people were becoming millionaires as a result of their good ideas.
Like all good things however, this positive infatuation with the Net came
to an end and it appears that the popularity pendulum is swinging the
other way.
To make matters worse, our TV channels seem to have launched themselves into
tabloid format in an attempt to grab the largest share of that all-important
6pm-7:30pm prime-time period.
Last night was the perfect example...
In the lead-up to the 6pm news on TV One, Judy Bailey talked about the
conviction of a child-porn trader "whose victims were as young as
two years of age".
Now nobody doubts that those kids portrayed in child-porn are indeed
victims - but the spin given in this news promo made it sound as if the
child porn trader had himself actually engaged in the abuse of the children
who's pictures were being traded. This would be a crime even more vile
than the trading of which he had actually been convicted.
Now have your say
|
Got something to say about today's column, or want to see what
others think?
Visit The Forums
While you're here, why not visit the Aardvark
Hall of Shame
and perhaps make your own nomination.
|
|
After hearing this promo, I listened with great interest to the actual
story when it aired but there was no indication at all that the guilty man
had actually abused children as young as two years of age.
I most certainly will not excuse his actions in trading this stuff - but
the news promo was unquestionably deceptive, a common theme with just
about every report I see on net-related child porn report aired by the
media.
And then, less than an hour later, we had the absolutely ridiculous report
on the Mt Manganui webcam.
Described by Susan Wood on TV1's Close Up programme as "a pervert's playground",
some outrageous and unsubstantiated claims were made in respect to those
who were accessing the camera.
The impression given by the programme was that web voyeurs with sexual
motives were queuing up to perve on the bathers lying on the sand.
Some sunbathers were interviewed by the TV programme and asked whether they
felt uneasy that the camera was broadcasting their picture on the Net. A
couple of those interviewed (we'll never know what the other said) commented
that yes, it made them uncomfortable. Strangely enough, although the prospect
of being seen by a few thousand people on the Net made them uncomfortable,
they had no qualms about being seen in exactly the same place and situation
by a national TV audience of more than a million -- go figure!
In an effort to further hype up the issue, viewers were told that the camera
was connected to a "powerful transmitter" (IP wireless which is usually
very low power).
For those who missed it,
a copy of the segment
was available on the TVNZ website this morning.
Is this the calibre of news reporting we can now expect when it comes to
issues involving the Net?
Anyone watching TV last night would probably believe that the Net is simply
the domain of child-abusers and sexual perverts, something that *we* know
is far from the truth.
Are you concerned at this myopic and decidedly sensationalist type of reporting?
Will it only get worse once TV1, TV3 and Prime TV all go head to head for
the "current affairs" slot at 7pm?
Aardvark Forums
The forums are back up at:
www.aardvarkforums.co.nz/forums,
have your say on today's column
Unfortunately you'll have to re-register because we're starting the new year
with a complete reinstall.
Yes, You Can Gift Money
I've published this website for the past nine years as a service to the
local internet and IT industry and during all that time it has been 100%
free to access. It is my intention to ensure that it remains completely
free and free of charge and contains only the most sparse levels of advertising.
Aardvark is not a business, it is a free resource.
If you feel that this is a good thing and/or you hold a "geniune affection"
for yours truly -- then you are welcome to gift me some
money using the buttons provided. In gifting this money you accept that no goods,
service or other consideration is offered, provided, accepted or anticipated in return.
Just click on the button to gift whatever you can afford.
NOTE: PayPal bills in US dollars so don't accidentally gift more than
what you were intending :-)
Contacting Aardvark
I'm always happy to hear from readers, whether they're delivering brickbats,
bouquets or news tip-offs.
If you'd like to contact me directly, please
this form. If you're happy for me to republish
your comments then please be sure and select For Publication.
Other media organisations seeking more information or republication rights
are also invited to contact me.
Add Aardvark To Your Own Website!
Got a moment? Want a little extra fresh content for your own website or
page?
Just add a
couple of lines of JavaScript
to your pages and you can get
a free summary of Aardvark's daily commentary -- automatically updated
each and every week-day.
Aardvark also makes a summary of this daily column available via XML using
the RSS format. More details can be found
here.
Contact me if you decide to use either of these feeds and
have any problems.
Linking Policy
Want to link to this site? Check out Aardvark's
Linking Policy.
|
Did you tell someone else about Aardvark today? If not then do it
now!
|
|