Note: This column represents the opinions
of the writer and as such, is not purported as fact
Sponsor's Message
|
I've been racking my brains to come up with a nice new original idea for
this morning's column -- but to no effect.
Telecom is behaving itself (as well as any monopoly provider can), the
credit card heist of last week is over, there are no major security
scares of note, and the world seems to be ticking over just fine.
Perhaps one item in the news worthy of comment is the announcement of a
VC fund worth $80m which, according to the headline, will try to find the
next Navman -- well the next two or three Navmans to be correct.
There was a time when, with my little notebook of "million dollar ideas" in
hand, I'd have queued up to have my concepts and creations scrutinised by
the managers of such a fund -- in the hope that I could then afford to
progress a few of those ideas to the stage of commercial success.
Now have your say
|
Got something to say about today's column, or want to see what
others think?
Visit The Forums
While you're here, why not visit the Aardvark
Hall of Shame
and perhaps make your own nomination.
|
|
These days I'm a little more jaded in respect to the value of such funds.
My recent period of enforced frugality has proven just how much can be
achieved without the investment of a fist-full of cash into some hi-risk venture.
It's amazing how much one or two people can do if they simply apply themselves
to the task of designing, refining and developing a product to the point where
it becomes a commercially viable reality.
What's more, the beauty of doing things this way is that, once you've reached
the point where you're actually making a profit, you still have ownership and
control.
Of course there will always be some areas of innovation where a good wad of
cash is essential -- but in others (and software is a good example) it's not.
The vast majority of the cost involved in developing, testing and debugging
a software project can be covered by way of the sweat of the developers.
History shows that some of the most popular and successful bits of software
ever to have hit the market were the result of kitchen-table developers.
In fact, the rise of the OSS model is perhaps the perfect example of how
world-beating software can be developed at low/no cost, simply through the
investment of time and effort by those responsible.
Another thing I've noticed is that those who are working from their kitchen table,
without the benefit of millions in VC, are often far more focused than their
well-funded peers. This focus can hike productivity and improve the quality
of the product because those un(der)-funded developers know that they won't
be having a happy Christmas until they've completed their tasks and shipped the
product.
I'm actually wondering whether the dearth of true venture capital in New Zealand
has actually been an advantage to us. While over-funded developers have
been driving around in their Porsches instead of burning the midnight code-cutting
oil, many Kiwis have been innovating and working hard in anticipation of such
wealth.
Could this explain why so many great products have come out of New Zealand
in the past decade or so?
Could this be why Kiwi programmers seem to have a great reputation and appear
to have no problems landing jobs overseas when they want?
What's your experience?
Have you done any successful kitchen-table development and if so, what was the
driving force behind that success?
Have you worked for a well-funded company and found things to be just a little
too cushy (too many toys in the office perhaps)?
Do companies such as Navman germinate from well-funded VC investments, or from
dedicated Kiwis investing their own time and money into a good idea?
Aardvark Forums
The forums are back up at:
www.aardvarkforums.co.nz/forums,
have your say on today's column
Yes, You Can Gift Money
I've published this website for the past nine years as a service to the
local internet and IT industry and during all that time it has been 100%
free to access. It is my intention to ensure that it remains completely
free and free of charge and contains only the most sparse levels of advertising.
Aardvark is not a business, it is a free resource.
If you feel that this is a good thing and/or you hold a "geniune affection"
for yours truly -- then you are welcome to gift me some
money using the buttons provided. In gifting this money you accept that no goods,
service or other consideration is offered, provided, accepted or anticipated in return.
Just click on the button to gift whatever you can afford.
NOTE: PayPal bills in US dollars so don't accidentally gift more than
what you were intending :-)
Contacting Aardvark
I'm always happy to hear from readers, whether they're delivering brickbats,
bouquets or news tip-offs.
If you'd like to contact me directly, please
this form. If you're happy for me to republish
your comments then please be sure and select For Publication.
Other media organisations seeking more information or republication rights
are also invited to contact me.
Add Aardvark To Your Own Website!
Got a moment? Want a little extra fresh content for your own website or
page?
Just add a
couple of lines of JavaScript
to your pages and you can get
a free summary of Aardvark's daily commentary -- automatically updated
each and every week-day.
Aardvark also makes a summary of this daily column available via XML using
the RSS format. More details can be found
here.
Contact me if you decide to use either of these feeds and
have any problems.
Linking Policy
Want to link to this site? Check out Aardvark's
Linking Policy.
|
Did you tell someone else about Aardvark today? If not then do it
now!
|
|